GSIB ranks 4th and IAT 8th of 9 funds in the Banks Category.
GSIB vs IAT
GSIB −0.02pt a year
0.35%0.37%
IAT 17.5×the volume
13.6K238K
GSIB vs IAT Performance
+25.4%+25.3%
- GSIB 0.35%, better
- IAT 0.37%
- GSIB $39M
- IAT $646M
- GSIB +25.4%, better
- IAT +25.3%
- GSIB 1.68%
- IAT 2.72%, better
- GSIB 32
- IAT 33
- GSIB 13.6K sh
- IAT 238K sh, better
- GSIB $59.90
- IAT $60.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSIB | IAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62Higher | D31 |
| Mission | C47 | |
| Risk | A82Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | D29 | C54Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | F12 |
| Durability | D29 | B68Higher |
Rank among Banks funds
Same Category. GSIB and IAT are both graded against the same 9 Banks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSIBB
IATD
In short
GSIB Most bank ETFs stop at the US border. GSIB goes after the other kind of bank: the world's systemically important ones, roughly 30 global megabanks in a single actively managed portfolio.
IAT Regional banking, undiluted: about 30 U.S. lenders, no insurers or brokers padding the basket, from an iShares fund that has been on the tape since 2006.
Stated mandate
GSIB The Fund seeks growth of capital through an actively managed portfolio of equity securities issued by companies operating in the global banking sector.
IAT The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. equity securities from the regional banking sector. It uses representative sampling to pursue index-like investment characteristics rather than necessarily holding every constituent.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSIB vs IAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSIB vs IAT Cost
Overpaying IAT vs GSIB
$387
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSIB 0.35%
$7,126
IAT 0.37%
$7,513
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSIB | IAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $670 | $36 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $2,590 | $136 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $7,513 | $387 |
- 0.35%GSIB, cheaper
- 0.37%IAT
- Middle half of Banks funds
- Median 0.35%
GSIB 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
IAT 7th cheapest of 9 funds
GSIB vs IAT Dividends
- GSIB 1.68%
- IAT 2.72%, better
- GSIB $1.00
- IAT $1.64
- GSIB $1.00
- IAT $0.42
- GSIB Dec 18, 2025
- IAT Sep 15, 2026
- GSIB Dec 19, 2025
- IAT Sep 18, 2026
- GSIB Irregular
- IAT Quarterly
Distribution history
GSIB vs IAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSIB 13.4%IAT 24.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSIB 2.12IAT 0.95
- Worst fall
- GSIB −17.7%IAT −55.5%
- Market sensitivity
- GSIB 0.58IAT 1.23
GSIB and IAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
