KBWB ranks 3rd and IAT 8th of 9 funds in the Banks Category.
IAT vs KBWB
KBWB −0.02pt a year
0.37%0.35%
KBWB 8.7×the volume
238K2.07M
KBWB +3.6pt
+8.2%+11.8%
IAT vs KBWB Performance
+6.9%+40.4%
- IAT 0.37%
- KBWB 0.35%, better
- IAT $646M
- KBWB $6.77B
- IAT +25.3%, better
- KBWB +18.3%
- IAT 2.72%, better
- KBWB 2.10%
- IAT 33
- KBWB 28
- IAT 238K sh
- KBWB 2.07M sh, better
- IAT $60.96
- KBWB $89.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IAT | KBWB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | B62Higher |
| Mission | C47 | |
| Risk | D33 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | C54 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | F12 | C46Higher |
| Durability | B68 | A75Higher |
Rank among Banks funds
Same Category. IAT and KBWB are both graded against the same 9 Banks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IATD
KBWBB
In short
IAT Regional banking, undiluted: about 30 U.S. lenders, no insurers or brokers padding the basket, from an iShares fund that has been on the tape since 2006.
KBWB Banks, and nothing but. KBWB has tracked the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index since 2011, packing roughly two dozen US bank stocks into one ticker with no insurers or asset managers diluting the theme.
Stated mandate
IAT The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. equity securities from the regional banking sector. It uses representative sampling to pursue index-like investment characteristics rather than necessarily holding every constituent.
KBWB The Fund seeks to track the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index and normally invests at least 90% of its total assets in securities represented by that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IAT vs KBWB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IAT vs KBWB Cost
Overpaying IAT vs KBWB
$387
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IAT 0.37%
$7,513
KBWB 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IAT | KBWB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $634 | $36 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $2,454 | $136 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $7,126 | $387 |
- 0.37%IAT
- 0.35%KBWB, cheaper
- Middle half of Banks funds
- Median 0.35%
KBWB 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
IAT 7th cheapest of 9 funds
IAT vs KBWB Dividends
- IAT 2.72%, better
- KBWB 2.10%
- IAT $1.64
- KBWB $1.87
- IAT $0.42
- KBWB $0.46
- IAT Sep 15, 2026
- KBWB Sep 21, 2026
- IAT Sep 18, 2026
- KBWB Sep 25, 2026
- IAT Quarterly
- KBWB Quarterly
Distribution history
IAT vs KBWB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IAT
- KBWB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IAT 24.0%KBWB 21.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IAT 0.95KBWB 1.35, better
- Worst fall
- IAT −55.5%KBWB −49.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IAT 1.23KBWB 1.24
IAT and KBWB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





