KBE ranks 2nd and IAT 8th of 9 funds in the Banks Category.
IAT vs KBE
KBE −0.02pt a year
0.37%0.35%
KBE 6.8×the volume
238K1.62M
KBE +1.4pt
+8.2%+9.6%
IAT vs KBE Performance
+6.9%+32.0%
- IAT 0.37%
- KBE 0.35%, better
- IAT $646M
- KBE $1.48B
- IAT +25.3%, better
- KBE +19.9%
- IAT 2.72%, better
- KBE 2.21%
- IAT 33
- KBE 108
- IAT 238K sh
- KBE 1.62M sh, better
- IAT $60.96
- KBE $67.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IAT | KBE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | B62Higher |
| Mission | C47 | |
| Risk | D33 | C50Higher |
| Tradability | C54 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | F12 | A86Higher |
| Durability | B68 | A76Higher |
Rank among Banks funds
Same Category. IAT and KBE are both graded against the same 9 Banks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IATD
KBEB
In short
IAT Regional banking, undiluted: about 30 U.S. lenders, no insurers or brokers padding the basket, from an iShares fund that has been on the tape since 2006.
KBE One of the original bank ETFs, running since 2005. It holds roughly 100 US banks in one ticker, spanning the whole bank segment of the market rather than a shortlist of household-name giants.
Stated mandate
IAT The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. equity securities from the regional banking sector. It uses representative sampling to pursue index-like investment characteristics rather than necessarily holding every constituent.
KBE The fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P Banks Select Industry Index and provides targeted exposure to the bank segment of the S&P Total Market Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IAT vs KBE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IAT vs KBE Cost
Overpaying IAT vs KBE
$387
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IAT 0.37%
$7,513
KBE 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IAT | KBE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $634 | $36 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $2,454 | $136 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $7,126 | $387 |
- 0.37%IAT
- 0.35%KBE, cheaper
- Middle half of Banks funds
- Median 0.35%
KBE 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
IAT 7th cheapest of 9 funds
IAT vs KBE Dividends
- IAT 2.72%, better
- KBE 2.21%
- IAT $1.64
- KBE $1.47
- IAT $0.42
- KBE $0.38
- IAT Sep 15, 2026
- KBE Sep 21, 2026
- IAT Sep 18, 2026
- KBE Sep 23, 2026
- IAT Quarterly
- KBE Quarterly
Distribution history
IAT vs KBE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IAT
- KBE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IAT 24.0%KBE 22.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IAT 0.95KBE 0.96, better
- Worst fall
- IAT −55.5%KBE −45.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IAT 1.23KBE 1.12
IAT and KBE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




