IEFA ranks 4th and GSID 15th of 20 funds in the Developed International Core Category.
GSID vs IEFA
IEFA −0.13pt a year
0.20%0.07%
IEFA 145.8×the volume
60.7K8.85M
GSID +0.1pt
+8.3%+8.2%
GSID vs IEFA Performance
+48.8%+48.4%
- GSID 0.20%
- IEFA 0.07%, better
- GSID $996M
- IEFA $189B
- GSID +13.2%
- IEFA +13.3%, better
- GSID 2.53%
- IEFA 3.41%, better
- GSID 902
- IEFA 2638
- GSID 60.7K sh
- IEFA 8.85M sh, better
- GSID $74.87
- IEFA $96.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSID | IEFA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | B68Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C44 | C44 |
| Tradability | F15 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A74 | A87Higher |
| Durability | D28 | A85Higher |
Rank among Developed International Core funds
Same Category. GSID and IEFA are both graded against the same 20 Developed International Core funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSIDC
IEFAA
In short
GSID Goldman's plain-vanilla international core: roughly 900 developed-market stocks outside North America, held directly, at 0.20% net of a waiver through December 29, 2026. A big Wall Street name doing a quiet index-fund job.
IEFA Developed markets outside the US and Canada, right down to the small caps: roughly 2,600 stocks for 0.07% a year. The category's workhorse, and one of the biggest, most heavily traded funds on the shelf.
Stated mandate
GSID The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index.
IEFA The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid- and small-capitalization developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSID vs IEFA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSID vs IEFA Cost
Overpaying GSID vs IEFA
$2,675
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSID 0.20%
$4,155
IEFA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSID | IEFA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $128 | $237 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $503 | $918 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $1,480 | $2,675 |
- 0.20%GSID
- 0.07%IEFA, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Core funds
- Median 0.10%
IEFA 7th cheapest of 20 funds
GSID 12th cheapest of 20 funds
GSID vs IEFA Dividends
- GSID 2.53%
- IEFA 3.41%, better
- GSID $1.88
- IEFA $3.29
- GSID $0.39
- IEFA $1.58
- GSID Sep 24, 2026
- IEFA Jun 15, 2026
- GSID Sep 30, 2026
- IEFA Jun 18, 2026
- GSID Quarterly
- IEFA Twice a year
Distribution history
GSID vs IEFA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GSID
- IEFA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSID 11.9%IEFA 11.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- GSID 1.18IEFA 1.20, better
- Worst fall
- GSID −29.5%, betterIEFA −30.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GSID 0.88IEFA 0.89
GSID and IEFA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



