INTF ranks 2nd and GSIE 7th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
GSIE vs INTF
INTF −0.09pt a year
0.25%0.16%
GSIE 1.3×the volume
413K312K
GSIE +0.3pt
+9.7%+9.4%
GSIE vs INTF Performance
+47.9%+61.9%
- GSIE 0.25%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- GSIE $6.02B
- INTF $3.77B
- GSIE +14.7%
- INTF +16.4%, better
- GSIE 2.63%
- INTF 3.04%, better
- GSIE 641
- INTF 500
- GSIE 413K sh, better
- INTF 312K sh
- GSIE $46.77
- INTF $41.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSIE | INTF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74 | A98Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C51 | C51 |
| Tradability | B63 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | B68 |
| Durability | A80 | A86Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. GSIE and INTF are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSIEB
INTFA
In short
GSIE Goldman's ActiveBeta engine pointed at developed markets outside the US: four factor sleeves (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) blended in equal weight across roughly 600 stocks. A tilt on the index, not a bet against it.
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
Stated mandate
GSIE The Fund seeks to track the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, which provides exposure to equity securities of developed-market issuers outside the United States.
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSIE vs INTF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSIE vs INTF Cost
Overpaying GSIE vs INTF
$1,817
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSIE 0.25%
$5,159
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSIE | INTF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $292 | $163 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $1,141 | $628 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $3,342 | $1,817 |
- 0.25%GSIE
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
GSIE 8th cheapest of 30 funds
GSIE vs INTF Dividends
- GSIE 2.63%
- INTF 3.04%, better
- GSIE $1.21
- INTF $1.24
- GSIE $0.26
- INTF $0.72
- GSIE Sep 24, 2026
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- GSIE Sep 30, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- GSIE Quarterly
- INTF Twice a year
Distribution history
GSIE vs INTF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GSIE
- INTF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSIE 11.2%INTF 11.2%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- GSIE 1.31INTF 1.45, better
- Worst fall
- GSIE −29.6%INTF −27.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GSIE 0.87INTF 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.