GSWO ranks 3rd and JHMD 20th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
GSWO vs JHMD
GSWO −0.24pt a year
0.15%0.39%
JHMD 1.5×the volume
64K94.7K
GSWO vs JHMD Performance
+0.5%−2.9%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- JHMD 0.39%
- GSWO $1.79B
- JHMD $995M
- GSWO
- JHMD +13.2%
- GSWO 1.46%
- JHMD 3.08%, better
- GSWO 751
- JHMD 570
- GSWO 64K sh
- JHMD 94.7K sh, better
- GSWO $64.95
- JHMD $44.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSWO | JHMD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | D33 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | F22 | B68Higher |
| Durability | B62Higher | B57 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. GSWO and JHMD are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSWOA
JHMDC
In short
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
JHMD A Dimensional-designed index in a John Hancock wrapper: roughly 600 large developed-market stocks outside North America, weighted toward the smaller, cheaper, more profitable end of the pool. Factor investing from the firm that wrote the playbook, in plain index form.
Stated mandate
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
JHMD The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSWO vs JHMD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSWO vs JHMD Cost
Overpaying JHMD vs GSWO
$4,761
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
JHMD 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSWO | JHMD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $705 | $431 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,725 | $1,654 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $7,898 | $4,761 |
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- 0.39%JHMD
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
JHMD 20th cheapest of 30 funds
GSWO vs JHMD Dividends
- GSWO 1.46%
- JHMD 3.08%, better
- GSWO $0.93
- JHMD $1.36
- GSWO $0.20
- JHMD $0.77
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- JHMD Jun 26, 2026
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- JHMD Jun 30, 2026
- GSWO Quarterly
- JHMD Twice a year
Distribution history
GSWO vs JHMD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSWO JHMD 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSWO JHMD 1.18
- Worst fall
- GSWO JHMD −28.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GSWO 0.75JHMD 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.