INTF ranks 1st and JHMD 20th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
INTF vs JHMD
INTF −0.23pt a year
0.16%0.39%
INTF 3.3×the volume
309K94.7K
INTF +2.0pt
+10.6%+8.6%
INTF vs JHMD Performance
+65.8%+51.4%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- JHMD 0.39%
- INTF $3.7B
- JHMD $995M
- INTF +17.0%, better
- JHMD +13.2%
- INTF 3.02%
- JHMD 3.08%, better
- INTF 501
- JHMD 570
- INTF 309K sh, better
- JHMD 94.7K sh
- INTF $41.10
- JHMD $44.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INTF | JHMD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | D33 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | B68 | B68 |
| Durability | A86Higher | B57 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. INTF and JHMD are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INTFA
JHMDC
In short
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
JHMD A Dimensional-designed index in a John Hancock wrapper: roughly 600 large developed-market stocks outside North America, weighted toward the smaller, cheaper, more profitable end of the pool. Factor investing from the firm that wrote the playbook, in plain index form.
Stated mandate
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
JHMD The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INTF vs JHMD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INTF vs JHMD Cost
Overpaying JHMD vs INTF
$4,556
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
JHMD 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INTF | JHMD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $705 | $413 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $2,725 | $1,584 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $7,898 | $4,556 |
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- 0.39%JHMD
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
JHMD 20th cheapest of 30 funds
INTF vs JHMD Dividends
- INTF 3.02%
- JHMD 3.08%, better
- INTF $1.24
- JHMD $1.36
- INTF $0.72
- JHMD $0.77
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- JHMD Jun 26, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- JHMD Jun 30, 2026
- INTF Twice a year
- JHMD Twice a year
Distribution history
INTF vs JHMD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INTF
- JHMD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INTF 11.2%, betterJHMD 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- INTF 1.45, betterJHMD 1.18
- Worst fall
- INTF −27.6%, betterJHMD −28.9%
- Market sensitivity
- INTF 0.74JHMD 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.