GSWO ranks 3rd and PIEL 29th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
GSWO vs PIEL
GSWO −0.34pt a year
0.15%0.49%
GSWO 122.4×the volume
64K523
GSWO vs PIEL Performance
+0.5%−0.3%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- PIEL 0.49%
- GSWO $1.79B
- PIEL $1M
- GSWO 1.46%
- PIEL
- GSWO 751
- PIEL 104
- GSWO 64K sh, better
- PIEL 523 sh
- GSWO $64.95
- PIEL $28.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSWO | PIEL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | F18 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | F3 |
| Holdings | F22 | F23Higher |
| Durability | B62Higher | D25 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. GSWO and PIEL are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSWOA
PIELF
In short
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
PIEL Most international funds hand you companies that mostly sell at home. PIEL screens developed markets outside the US for the opposite: large and mid caps with heavy foreign sales and high free cash flow margins, then keeps the top 100.
Stated mandate
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
PIEL The fund seeks global market growth by screening the FTSE Developed ex US Index for the top 100 large- and mid-capitalization companies with high foreign sales and high free-cash-flow margins.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSWO vs PIEL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSWO vs PIEL Cost
Overpaying PIEL vs GSWO
$6,655
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
PIEL 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSWO | PIEL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $883 | $609 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $3,394 | $2,323 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $9,792 | $6,655 |
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- 0.49%PIEL
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
PIEL 25th cheapest of 30 funds
GSWO vs PIEL Dividends
- GSWO 1.46%
- PIEL
- GSWO $0.93
- PIEL None
- GSWO $0.20
- PIEL
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- PIEL
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- PIEL
- GSWO Quarterly
- PIEL
Distribution history
GSWO vs PIEL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- GSWO 0.75PIEL 1.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.