Skip to content

GSWO vs PIEL

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF

GSWOACboe

Pacer International Export Leaders ETF

PIELFCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

GSWO −0.34pt a year

GSWO0.15%PIEL0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GSWO 122.4×the volume

GSWO64KPIEL523

GSWO vs PIEL Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.5%GSWO−0.3%PIEL

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GSWO +0.5%. PIEL −0.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%2%4%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GSWO 0.15%, better
PIEL 0.49%
Fund size
GSWO $1.79B
PIEL $1M
Yield (12M)
GSWO 1.46%
PIEL No data
Holdings
GSWO 751
PIEL 104
Avg volume (30D)
GSWO 64K sh, better
PIEL 523 sh
NAV per share
GSWO $64.95
PIEL $28.37
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GSWO: Cost 98, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 86, Holdings 22, Durability 62. PIEL: Cost 17, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 3, Holdings 23, Durability 25.
Pillar letters and Scores for GSWO, PIEL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGSWOPIEL
Cost30% weightA98HigherF17
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB67HigherF18
Tradability15% weightA86HigherF3
Holdings10% weightF22F23Higher
Durability5% weightB62HigherD25

Rank among International Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GSWO and PIEL are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

International Multifactor⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

GSWO ranks 3rd and PIEL 29th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AINTFiShares International Equity Factor ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2ADFAIDimensional International Core Equity Market ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3AGSWOGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 4AFDEVFidelity International Multifactor ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 29FFPAFirst Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX FundScore 15
  6. Rank 29FPIELPacer International Export Leaders ETFScore 15

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GSWOAGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF

PIELFPacer International Export Leaders ETF

In short

GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.

PIEL Most international funds hand you companies that mostly sell at home. PIEL screens developed markets outside the US for the opposite: large and mid caps with heavy foreign sales and high free cash flow margins, then keeps the top 100.

Stated mandate

GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.

PIEL The fund seeks global market growth by screening the FTSE Developed ex US Index for the top 100 large- and mid-capitalization companies with high foreign sales and high free-cash-flow margins.

Why people hold it

  • GSWO 0.15% a year against a 0.69% median for its global active-equity peers, and cheaper than fellow top-graded names DFAW (0.24%) and AVGE (0.25%).
  • Value, momentum, quality and low volatility come from one published ActiveBeta index methodology, not a manager's discretionary call.gsam.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in its global equity peer group: a multi-billion-dollar fund in the standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper that pays quarterly.
  • PIEL Two-step screen with a clear logic: filter the FTSE Developed ex US Index for high foreign sales, then keep the 100 highest free cash flow margins, weighted by market cap with a 5% cap per name.sec.govpaceretfs.com
  • Not a lab experiment. It is the overseas build of the export-leaders template Pacer has run on US stocks since 2018, pointed at non-US exporters instead.paceretfs.comstockanalysis.com
  • The cash-flow step does real work: ranking on free cash flow margin tilts the basket toward companies converting sales into cash, which the broad developed ex-US index does not screen for.paceretfs.com
  • Rules-based and transparent: roughly 100 stocks, a published index, and a 5% cap that stops one giant exporter from running the portfolio.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • GSWO Despite the "World" name, the reference index is MSCI World ex USA, so US stocks sit outside the mandate.
  • Launched in 2022, so the live record is short, and factor blends can trail plain cap-weighted benchmarks for long stretches.
  • Four factors in one basket can pull against each other; the net tilt is milder than a single-factor fund.
  • PIEL The screen costs you: 0.49% sits above the typical international multifactor fund, and well above plain factor peers like GSWO (0.15%) and INTF (0.16%).
  • It listed in December 2025 and is still a small fund, so trading is thinner than at the category's heavyweights and bid-ask spreads can run wider.
  • Short history means there is no record yet of how an exporter-and-cash-flow screen behaves through a full cycle in currencies, trade policy, or a global slowdown.

Full GSWO profile⁠

Full PIEL profile⁠

GSWO vs PIEL Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GSWO vs PIEL Cost

Overpaying PIEL vs GSWO

$6,655

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GSWO 0.15%

    $3,137

  • PIEL 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GSWO 0.15%
  • PIEL 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PIEL $9,792GSWO $3,137

Year by year

YearGSWOPIELOverpaying
10$274$883$609
20$1,071$3,394$2,323
30$3,137$9,792$6,655

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
  • 0.49%PIEL
  • Middle half of International Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.34%

GSWO cheapest of 30 funds

PIEL 25th cheapest of 30 funds

GSWO vs PIEL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GSWO 1.46%
PIEL No data
Payout (12M)
GSWO $0.93
PIEL None
Last payment
GSWO $0.20
PIEL No data
Ex-dividend
GSWO Sep 24, 2026
PIEL No data
Paid on
GSWO Sep 30, 2026
PIEL No data
Frequency
GSWO Quarterly
PIEL No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

GSWOQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll GSWO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2022 $0.31; Sep 26, 2022 $0.16; Dec 27, 2022 $0.20; Mar 27, 2023 $0.17; Jun 26, 2023 $0.31; Sep 25, 2023 $0.16; Dec 26, 2023 $0.26; Mar 22, 2024 $0.15; Jun 24, 2024 $0.32; Sep 24, 2024 $0.18; Dec 23, 2024 $0.21; Mar 25, 2025 $0.16; Jun 24, 2025 $0.37; Sep 24, 2025 $0.24; Dec 23, 2025 $0.23; Mar 25, 2026 $0.19; Jun 24, 2026 $0.32; Sep 24, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
PIELAll PIEL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GSWO vs PIEL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GSWO 0.75PIEL 1.19

Popular comparisons

  • GSWOAvsINTFA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF · iShares International Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.16%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PIELFvsINTFA

    Pacer International Export Leaders ETF · iShares International Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.16%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSWOAvsDFAIA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF · Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PIELFvsDFAIA

    Pacer International Export Leaders ETF · Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSWOAvsFDEVA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF · Fidelity International Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PIELFvsFDEVA

    Pacer International Export Leaders ETF · Fidelity International Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.