INTF ranks 1st and PIEL 29th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
INTF vs PIEL
INTF −0.33pt a year
0.16%0.49%
INTF 590.9×the volume
309K523
INTF vs PIEL Performance
+11.0%+12.0%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- PIEL 0.49%
- INTF $3.7B
- PIEL $1M
- INTF +17.0%
- PIEL
- INTF 3.02%
- PIEL
- INTF 501
- PIEL 104
- INTF 309K sh, better
- PIEL 523 sh
- INTF $41.10
- PIEL $28.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INTF | PIEL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55Higher | F18 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | F3 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | F23 |
| Durability | A86Higher | D25 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. INTF and PIEL are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INTFA
PIELF
In short
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
PIEL Most international funds hand you companies that mostly sell at home. PIEL screens developed markets outside the US for the opposite: large and mid caps with heavy foreign sales and high free cash flow margins, then keeps the top 100.
Stated mandate
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
PIEL The fund seeks global market growth by screening the FTSE Developed ex US Index for the top 100 large- and mid-capitalization companies with high foreign sales and high free-cash-flow margins.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INTF vs PIEL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INTF vs PIEL Cost
Overpaying PIEL vs INTF
$6,450
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
PIEL 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INTF | PIEL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $883 | $591 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $3,394 | $2,253 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $9,792 | $6,450 |
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- 0.49%PIEL
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
PIEL 25th cheapest of 30 funds
INTF vs PIEL Dividends
- INTF 3.02%
- PIEL
- INTF $1.24
- PIEL None
- INTF $0.72
- PIEL
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- PIEL
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- PIEL
- INTF Twice a year
- PIEL
Distribution history
INTF vs PIEL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INTF 11.2%PIEL
- Return per unit of risk
- INTF 1.45PIEL
- Worst fall
- INTF −27.6%PIEL
- Market sensitivity
- INTF 0.74PIEL 1.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.