GSWO ranks 3rd and UIVM 16th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
GSWO vs UIVM
GSWO −0.20pt a year
0.15%0.35%
GSWO 14.5×the volume
64K4.43K
GSWO vs UIVM Performance
+0.5%−1.3%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- UIVM 0.35%
- GSWO $1.79B
- UIVM $330M
- GSWO
- UIVM +25.0%
- GSWO 1.46%
- UIVM 4.30%, better
- GSWO 751
- UIVM 200
- GSWO 64K sh, better
- UIVM 4.43K sh
- GSWO $64.95
- UIVM $73.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSWO | UIVM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | C45 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | F19 |
| Holdings | F22 | A70Higher |
| Durability | B62Higher | C49 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. GSWO and UIVM are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSWOA
UIVMC
In short
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
UIVM Two screens that rarely agree, value and momentum, pointed at developed markets outside the US. Victory has run this rules-based blend since 2017, holding roughly 190 names instead of picking a side.
Stated mandate
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
UIVM The fund seeks international equity exposure through a rules-based index emphasizing securities with higher value and momentum characteristics within the MSCI World ex USA universe.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSWO vs UIVM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSWO vs UIVM Cost
Overpaying UIVM vs GSWO
$3,989
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
UIVM 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSWO | UIVM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $634 | $360 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,454 | $1,383 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $7,126 | $3,989 |
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- 0.35%UIVM
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
UIVM 17th cheapest of 30 funds
GSWO vs UIVM Dividends
- GSWO 1.46%
- UIVM 4.30%, better
- GSWO $0.93
- UIVM $3.15
- GSWO $0.20
- UIVM $0.28
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- UIVM Oct 8, 2026
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- UIVM Oct 9, 2026
- GSWO Quarterly
- UIVM Monthly
Distribution history
GSWO vs UIVM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSWO UIVM 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSWO UIVM 1.61
- Worst fall
- GSWO UIVM −27.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GSWO 0.75UIVM 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.