INTF ranks 1st and UIVM 16th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
INTF vs UIVM
INTF −0.19pt a year
0.16%0.35%
INTF 69.8×the volume
309K4.43K
UIVM +2.2pt
+10.6%+12.8%
INTF vs UIVM Performance
+65.8%+82.3%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- UIVM 0.35%
- INTF $3.7B
- UIVM $330M
- INTF +17.0%
- UIVM +25.0%, better
- INTF 3.02%
- UIVM 4.30%, better
- INTF 501
- UIVM 200
- INTF 309K sh, better
- UIVM 4.43K sh
- INTF $41.10
- UIVM $73.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INTF | UIVM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | C45 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | F19 |
| Holdings | B68 | A70Higher |
| Durability | A86Higher | C49 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. INTF and UIVM are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INTFA
UIVMC
In short
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
UIVM Two screens that rarely agree, value and momentum, pointed at developed markets outside the US. Victory has run this rules-based blend since 2017, holding roughly 190 names instead of picking a side.
Stated mandate
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
UIVM The fund seeks international equity exposure through a rules-based index emphasizing securities with higher value and momentum characteristics within the MSCI World ex USA universe.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INTF vs UIVM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INTF vs UIVM Cost
Overpaying UIVM vs INTF
$3,784
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
UIVM 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INTF | UIVM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $634 | $342 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $2,454 | $1,313 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $7,126 | $3,784 |
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- 0.35%UIVM
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
UIVM 17th cheapest of 30 funds
INTF vs UIVM Dividends
- INTF 3.02%
- UIVM 4.30%, better
- INTF $1.24
- UIVM $3.15
- INTF $0.72
- UIVM $0.28
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- UIVM Oct 8, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- UIVM Oct 9, 2026
- INTF Twice a year
- UIVM Monthly
Distribution history
INTF vs UIVM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INTF
- UIVM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INTF 11.2%, betterUIVM 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- INTF 1.45UIVM 1.61, better
- Worst fall
- INTF −27.6%, betterUIVM −27.9%
- Market sensitivity
- INTF 0.74UIVM 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.