SCHZ ranks 2nd and GTO 33rd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
GTO vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SCHZ 8.1×the volume
293K2.37M
GTO +1.3pt
+2.5%+1.2%
GTO vs SCHZ Performance
−1.5%−1.0%
- GTO 0.35%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- GTO $2.57B
- SCHZ $10.8B
- GTO −0.1%, better
- SCHZ −0.2%
- GTO 4.94%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- GTO 1901
- SCHZ 12610
- GTO 293K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- GTO $45.27
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GTO | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A85 | A85 |
| Holdings | B65 | A78Higher |
| Durability | A85 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. GTO and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GTOA
SCHZA
In short
GTO The active take on the boring middle of your bond shelf: no index to hug, just a mandate to pull total return from income plus price gains. Priced at 0.35%, right about what the average bond ETF charges.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
GTO The fund seeks maximum total return through a combination of income and capital appreciation.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GTO vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GTO vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying GTO vs SCHZ
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GTO 0.35%
$7,126
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GTO | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%GTO
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
GTO 60th cheapest of 114 funds
GTO vs SCHZ Dividends
- GTO 4.94%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- GTO $2.24
- SCHZ $0.96
- GTO $0.19
- SCHZ $0.08
- GTO Oct 19, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- GTO Oct 23, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- GTO Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
GTO vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GTO
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GTO 5.7%SCHZ 5.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GTO 0.27, betterSCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- GTO −19.8%SCHZ −17.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GTO 1.00SCHZ 0.99
GTO and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
