HYLB ranks 3rd and GTOH 49th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
GTOH vs HYLB
HYLB −0.43pt a year
0.48%0.05%
HYLB 781.8×the volume
1.56K1.22M
GTOH vs HYLB Performance
−1.1%−1.2%
- GTOH 0.48%
- HYLB 0.05%, better
- GTOH $13M
- HYLB $3.3B
- GTOH
- HYLB +1.9%
- GTOH 6.43%
- HYLB 6.73%, better
- GTOH 166
- HYLB 1280
- GTOH 1.56K sh
- HYLB 1.22M sh, better
- GTOH $24.62
- HYLB $35.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GTOH | HYLB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A97 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C48 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | C42 | A88Higher |
| Durability | C45 | A77Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. GTOH and HYLB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GTOHB
HYLBA
In short
GTOH Most high-yield ETFs are index machines that own whatever the benchmark hands them. GTOH is the active, short-maturity cut: a manager picks roughly 160 junk bonds, keeps maturities short, and pays out monthly.
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
GTOH The Fund is an actively managed ETF focused on generating current income through a short-duration high-yield strategy.
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GTOH vs HYLB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GTOH vs HYLB Cost
Overpaying GTOH vs HYLB
$8,545
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GTOH 0.48%
$9,605
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GTOH | HYLB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $865 | $92 | $773 |
| 20 | $3,328 | $360 | $2,968 |
| 30 | $9,605 | $1,060 | $8,545 |
- 0.48%GTOH
- 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
GTOH 50th cheapest of 84 funds
GTOH vs HYLB Dividends
- GTOH 6.43%
- HYLB 6.73%, better
- GTOH $1.58
- HYLB $2.37
- GTOH $0.13
- HYLB $0.20
- GTOH Oct 19, 2026
- HYLB Oct 1, 2026
- GTOH Oct 23, 2026
- HYLB Oct 8, 2026
- GTOH Monthly
- HYLB Monthly
Distribution history
GTOH vs HYLB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GTOH HYLB 4.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- GTOH HYLB 0.82
- Worst fall
- GTOH HYLB −15.5%
- Market sensitivity
- GTOH 0.25HYLB 0.66
Popular comparisons
- 0.48% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.