SCYB ranks 1st and GTOH 49th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
GTOH vs SCYB
SCYB −0.45pt a year
0.48%0.03%
SCYB 707.9×the volume
1.56K1.1M
GTOH vs SCYB Performance
−1.1%−1.3%
- GTOH 0.48%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- GTOH $13M
- SCYB $2.8B
- GTOH
- SCYB +2.0%
- GTOH 6.43%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- GTOH 166
- SCYB 1844
- GTOH 1.56K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- GTOH $24.62
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GTOH | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A97 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C48 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C42 | A99Higher |
| Durability | C45 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. GTOH and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GTOHB
SCYBA
In short
GTOH Most high-yield ETFs are index machines that own whatever the benchmark hands them. GTOH is the active, short-maturity cut: a manager picks roughly 160 junk bonds, keeps maturities short, and pays out monthly.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
GTOH The Fund is an actively managed ETF focused on generating current income through a short-duration high-yield strategy.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GTOH vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GTOH vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying GTOH vs SCYB
$8,967
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GTOH 0.48%
$9,605
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GTOH | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $865 | $55 | $810 |
| 20 | $3,328 | $216 | $3,112 |
| 30 | $9,605 | $638 | $8,967 |
- 0.48%GTOH
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
GTOH 50th cheapest of 84 funds
GTOH vs SCYB Dividends
- GTOH 6.43%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- GTOH $1.58
- SCYB $1.80
- GTOH $0.13
- SCYB $0.16
- GTOH Oct 19, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- GTOH Oct 23, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- GTOH Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
GTOH vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GTOH SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GTOH SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- GTOH SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GTOH 0.25SCYB 0.28
GTOH and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.48% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
