Skip to content

GUSE vs HIAI

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Ai Funds High Conviction US Equity AI-Managed ETF

HIAI—Cboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.57pt a year

GUSE0.30%HIAI0.87%

Avg volume · 30D

HIAI 1.3×the volume

GUSE24.9KHIAI32.3K

GUSE vs HIAI Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.0%GUSE−1.0%HIAI

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GUSE −1.0%. HIAI −1.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
HIAI 0.87%
Fund size
GUSE $421M
HIAI $21M
Holdings
GUSE 122
HIAI 48
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh
HIAI 32.3K sh, better
NAV per share
GUSE $46.05
HIAI $25.39
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —HIAINot yet graded
GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, HIAI, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSEHIAI
Cost30% weightA97Not scored
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA94Not scored
Tradability15% weightC46Not scored
Holdings10% weightA89Not scored
Durability5% weightA85Not scored

Rank among US Active Growth funds

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. HIAINot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

HIAI—Ai Funds High Conviction US Equity AI-Managed ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

HIAI No data

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

HIAI No data

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

HIAI No data

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

HIAI No data

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full HIAI profile⁠

GUSE vs HIAI Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs HIAI Cost

Overpaying HIAI vs GUSE

$10,387

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • HIAI 0.87%

    $16,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • HIAI 0.87%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530HIAI $16,536GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSEHIAIOverpaying
10$545$1,542$997
20$2,113$5,830$3,717
30$6,149$16,536$10,387

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.87%HIAI
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

HIAI 86th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs HIAI Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
HIAI None
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
HIAI No data
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
HIAI No data
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
HIAI No data
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
HIAI No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
HIAIAll HIAI payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GUSE vs HIAI Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.93HIAI 0.00

GUSE and HIAI in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HIAI—vsJUSAA

    Ai Funds High Conviction US Equity AI-Managed ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HIAI—vsLRGCA

    Ai Funds High Conviction US Equity AI-Managed ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HIAI—vsFELGA

    Ai Funds High Conviction US Equity AI-Managed ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.