Skip to content

GUSE vs LRGG

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF

LRGGBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.14pt a year

GUSE0.30%LRGG0.44%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGG 1.4×the volume

GUSE29KLRGG39.5K

GUSE vs LRGG Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+8.1%GUSE+0.9%LRGG

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. GUSE +8.1%. LRGG +0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
LRGG 0.44%
Fund size
GUSE $427M
LRGG $295M
1Y total return
GUSE No data
LRGG +0.6%
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
LRGG 0.15%
Holdings
GUSE 122
LRGG 21
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 29K sh
LRGG 39.5K sh, better
NAV per share
GUSE $45.72
LRGG $30.86
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 95, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 86, Durability 85. LRGG: Cost 74, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 29, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, LRGG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSELRGG
Cost30% weightA97HigherA74
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA95HigherC49
Tradability15% weightC45A77Higher
Holdings10% weightA86HigherD29
Durability5% weightA85HigherC54

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and LRGG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and LRGG 20th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 82
  4. Rank 19BDAKDakota Active Equity ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 20BLRGGNomura Focused Large Growth ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 21BCGGGCapital Group U.S. Large Growth ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

LRGGBNomura Focused Large Growth ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

LRGG Roughly two dozen large-cap growth names, run by the ex-Macquarie team now under Nomura's roof. Active, unapologetically top-heavy, and 0.44% with no fee waiver in the picture.

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

LRGG The fund seeks to provide growth of capital.

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • LRGG "Focused" is not marketing here: the portfolio runs to about two dozen stocks, so individual picks actually register instead of being diluted into an index.stockanalysis.com
  • 0.44%, with no fee waiver holding it down, sits below the category median. FELG and JUSA charge 0.18%, so cheap it is not, but it undercuts the typical active rival.
  • Rates as one of the stronger implementations among the conviction-growth funds we cover, on the strength of its cost and day-to-day trading profile.

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.
  • LRGG Top-heavy by design: a handful of mega-cap names carry much of the portfolio, so a stumble in one or two of them shows up fast.stockanalysis.com
  • Lightly traded next to the category's heavyweights, which can mean wider spreads; limit orders earn their keep.
  • Listed in 2024 and rebranded after Nomura bought Macquarie's US public investments business, so the record under this banner is short.nomuraassetmanagement.com

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full LRGG profile⁠

GUSE vs LRGG Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs LRGG Cost

Overpaying LRGG vs GUSE

$2,703

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • LRGG 0.44%

    $8,852

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • LRGG 0.44%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530LRGG $8,852GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSELRGGOverpaying
10$545$794$249
20$2,113$3,061$948
30$6,149$8,852$2,703

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.44%LRGG
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

LRGG 24th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs LRGG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
LRGG 0.15%
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
LRGG $0.05
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
LRGG $0.05
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
LRGG Dec 31, 2025
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
LRGG Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
LRGG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
LRGGIrregular · 2 paymentsAll LRGG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2024 $0.04; Dec 31, 2025 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

GUSE vs LRGG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataLRGG 12.4%since Jun 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataLRGG 0.33since Jun 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataLRGG −18.9%since May 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.94LRGG 0.87

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGGBvsJUSAA

    Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGGBvsLRGCA

    Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGGBvsFELGA

    Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.