GUSE ranks 2nd and LRGG 20th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GUSE vs LRGG
GUSE −0.14pt a year
0.30%0.44%
LRGG 1.4×the volume
29K39.5K
GUSE vs LRGG Performance
+8.1%+0.9%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- LRGG 0.44%
- GUSE $427M
- LRGG $295M
- GUSE
- LRGG +0.6%
- GUSE
- LRGG 0.15%
- GUSE 122
- LRGG 21
- GUSE 29K sh
- LRGG 39.5K sh, better
- GUSE $45.72
- LRGG $30.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSE | LRGG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A74 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A95Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | C45 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | A86Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A85Higher | C54 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GUSE and LRGG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSEA
LRGGB
In short
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
LRGG Roughly two dozen large-cap growth names, run by the ex-Macquarie team now under Nomura's roof. Active, unapologetically top-heavy, and 0.44% with no fee waiver in the picture.
Stated mandate
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
LRGG The fund seeks to provide growth of capital.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSE vs LRGG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSE vs LRGG Cost
Overpaying LRGG vs GUSE
$2,703
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
LRGG 0.44%
$8,852
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSE | LRGG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $794 | $249 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,061 | $948 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $8,852 | $2,703 |
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- 0.44%LRGG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
LRGG 24th cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE vs LRGG Dividends
- GUSE
- LRGG 0.15%
- GUSE
- LRGG $0.05
- GUSE $0.30
- LRGG $0.05
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- LRGG Dec 31, 2025
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- LRGG Dec 31, 2025
- GUSE Irregular
- LRGG Irregular
Distribution history
GUSE vs LRGG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GUSE LRGG 12.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- GUSE LRGG 0.33
- Worst fall
- GUSE LRGG −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GUSE 0.94LRGG 0.87
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.