Skip to content

GUSE vs NSIG

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

North Square Growth Opportunities ETF

NSIGBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.08pt a year

GUSE0.30%NSIG0.38%

Avg volume · 30D

NSIG 1.3×the volume

GUSE29KNSIG38.4K

GUSE vs NSIG Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−5.5%GUSE−11.4%NSIG

Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 5, 2026. GUSE −5.5%. NSIG −11.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−7.5%−2.5%0%2.5%5%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
NSIG 0.38%
Fund size
GUSE $427M
NSIG $59M
Holdings
GUSE 122
NSIG 83
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 29K sh
NSIG 38.4K sh, better
NAV per share
GUSE $45.72
NSIG $23.89
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 95, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 86, Durability 85. NSIG: Cost 88, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 69, Holdings 42, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, NSIG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSENSIG
Cost30% weightA97HigherA88
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA95HigherC49
Tradability15% weightC45B69Higher
Holdings10% weightA86HigherC42
Durability5% weightA85HigherF21

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and NSIG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and NSIG 16th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 82
  4. Rank 12BLRGEClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 16BNSIGNorth Square Growth Opportunities ETFScore 65
  6. Rank 16BVUSGVanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETFScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

NSIGBNorth Square Growth Opportunities ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

NSIG No data

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

NSIG No data

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

NSIG No data

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

NSIG No data

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full NSIG profile⁠

GUSE vs NSIG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs NSIG Cost

Overpaying NSIG vs GUSE

$1,557

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • NSIG 0.38%

    $7,706

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • NSIG 0.38%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530NSIG $7,706GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSENSIGOverpaying
10$545$688$143
20$2,113$2,658$545
30$6,149$7,706$1,557

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.38%NSIG
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

NSIG 10th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs NSIG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
NSIG None
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
NSIG No data
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
NSIG No data
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
NSIG No data
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
NSIG No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
NSIGAll NSIG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GUSE vs NSIG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.94NSIG 0.00

GUSE and NSIG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NSIGBvsJUSAA

    North Square Growth Opportunities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NSIGBvsLRGCA

    North Square Growth Opportunities ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NSIGBvsFELGA

    North Square Growth Opportunities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.