Skip to content

GUSE vs NUGO

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Nuveen Growth Opportunities

NUGOBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.20pt a year

GUSE0.30%NUGO0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

NUGO 3.5×the volume

GUSE32.3KNUGO114K

GUSE vs NUGO Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+11.4%GUSE+1.6%NUGO

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. GUSE +11.4%. NUGO +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
NUGO 0.50%
Fund size
GUSE $417M
NUGO $2.17B
1Y total return
GUSE No data
NUGO +1.6%
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
NUGO 0.00%
Holdings
GUSE 122
NUGO 44
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 32.3K sh
NUGO 114K sh, better
NAV per share
GUSE $43.96
NUGO $39.07
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 95, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 85, Durability 85. NUGO: Cost 62, Risk 35, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 39, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, NUGO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSENUGO
Cost30% weightA97HigherB62
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA95HigherD35
Tradability15% weightC46A78Higher
Holdings10% weightA85HigherD39
Durability5% weightA85HigherA81

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and NUGO are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and NUGO 29th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 83
  4. Rank 29BIWFGNYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 29BNUGONuveen Growth OpportunitiesScore 57
  6. Rank 33BWINNHarbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN)Score 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

NUGOBNuveen Growth Opportunities

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

NUGO Nuveen's house view on US growth, trimmed to roughly 40 names: a high-conviction cut of the Russell 1000 Growth universe, actively managed since 2021 for 0.50% a year.

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

NUGO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • NUGO Roughly 40 holdings out of a Russell 1000 Growth universe of hundreds. This is a best-ideas list built on earnings growth, cash flow quality and relative valuation, not a closet index.prnewswire.com
  • 0.50% a year, with no fee waiver doing the work, sits near the typical fee in its active US growth peer group.
  • Over a billion dollars in assets and a moderate, steady trading pulse since its 2021 launch. Size and age are rarely the question marks here.
  • Nuveen, the asset-management arm of TIAA, runs it as a purpose-built ETF rather than a mutual fund in a new wrapper.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.
  • NUGO Concentration cuts both ways. At about 40 names, a single position swings the portfolio far more than it would inside a 500-stock index fund.
  • Cheaper shelf-mates exist: FELG and JUSA each charge 0.18%, roughly a third of this fee, though both take a broader, index-anchored approach.
  • The stated goal is long-term capital appreciation, not income. Payouts are incidental here, so this is not an income vehicle.

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full NUGO profile⁠

GUSE vs NUGO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs NUGO Cost

Overpaying NUGO vs GUSE

$3,830

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • NUGO 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • NUGO 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530NUGO $9,979GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSENUGOOverpaying
10$545$900$355
20$2,113$3,460$1,347
30$6,149$9,979$3,830

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.50%NUGO
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

NUGO 33rd cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs NUGO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
NUGO 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
NUGO None
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
NUGO No data
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
NUGO No data
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
NUGO No data
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
NUGO No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
NUGO4 paymentsAll NUGO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 16, 2021 $0.0012; Dec 15, 2022 $0.05; Dec 14, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.01. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

GUSE vs NUGO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataNUGO 17.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataNUGO 1.03
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataNUGO −38.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.94NUGO 1.22

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NUGOBvsJUSAA

    Nuveen Growth Opportunities · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NUGOBvsLRGCA

    Nuveen Growth Opportunities · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NUGOBvsFELGA

    Nuveen Growth Opportunities · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.