Skip to content
etf.net

GUSE vs ZINN

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF

ZINNDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.45pt a year

GUSE0.30%ZINN0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 5.1×the volume

GUSE32.3KZINN6.38K

GUSE vs ZINN Performance

Oct 9, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−3.5%GUSE−12.7%ZINN

Oct 9, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. GUSE −3.5%. ZINN −12.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%0%Oct 9Oct 23Nov 9
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
ZINN 0.75%
Fund size
GUSE $417M
ZINN $110M
Holdings
GUSE 122
ZINN 35
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 32.3K sh, better
ZINN 6.38K sh
NAV per share
GUSE $43.96
ZINN $35.89
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 95, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 85, Durability 85. ZINN: Cost 19, Risk 14, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 62, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, ZINN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSEZINN
Cost30% weightA97HigherF19
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA95HigherF14
Tradability15% weightC46C46
Holdings10% weightA85HigherB62
Durability5% weightA85HigherB67

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and ZINN are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and ZINN 77th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 83
  4. Rank 75DTFGZThornburg Focus Growth FundScore 34
  5. Rank 77DZINNVirtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETFScore 32
  6. Rank 78DGKAdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

ZINNDVirtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

ZINN No data

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

ZINN No data

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

ZINN No data

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

ZINN No data

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full ZINN profile⁠

GUSE vs ZINN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs ZINN Cost

Overpaying ZINN vs GUSE

$8,333

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • ZINN 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • ZINN 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530ZINN $14,482GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSEZINNOverpaying
10$545$1,336$791
20$2,113$5,078$2,965
30$6,149$14,482$8,333

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.75%ZINN
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

ZINN 72nd cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs ZINN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
ZINN None
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
ZINN No data
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
ZINN No data
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
ZINN No data
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
ZINN No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
ZINNAll ZINN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GUSE vs ZINN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.94ZINN 1.70

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZINNDvsJUSAA

    Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZINNDvsLRGCA

    Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZINNDvsFELGA

    Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.