SFGV ranks 3rd and GVAL 6th of 15 funds in the Global Active Value Category.
GVAL vs SFGV
SFGV −0.35pt a year
0.68%0.33%
GVAL 10.7×the volume
152K14.3K
GVAL vs SFGV Performance
+24.0%+18.5%
- GVAL 0.68%
- SFGV 0.33%, better
- GVAL $575M
- SFGV $1.18B
- GVAL +24.0%, better
- SFGV +18.5%
- GVAL 2.60%, better
- SFGV 2.23%
- GVAL 112
- SFGV 517
- GVAL 152K sh, better
- SFGV 14.3K sh
- GVAL $36.31
- SFGV $36.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GVAL | SFGV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C50 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | A73Higher | C43 |
| Durability | A83Higher | A75 |
Rank among Global Active Value funds
Same Category. GVAL and SFGV are both graded against the same 15 Global Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GVALB
SFGVA
In short
GVAL A deep-value passport: GVAL ranks world markets by cyclically adjusted P/E, equal-weights the cheapest ones, then buys the cheapest stocks inside them. Running since 2014 at 0.68%, near the typical global value fee.
SFGV A wealth manager's global value model in ETF clothing: SFGV hunts profitable companies with cheap cash flows and a habit of paying shareholders back, at 0.33% net of a waiver through March 31, 2027, below most global value rivals.
Stated mandate
GVAL The fund seeks income and capital appreciation. It actively invests at least 80% of assets in equities of companies in developed and emerging markets with strong value characteristics, selected through Cambria’s quantitative algorithm.
SFGV The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GVAL vs SFGV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GVAL vs SFGV Cost
Overpaying GVAL vs SFGV
$6,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GVAL 0.68%
$13,252
SFGV 0.33%
$6,737
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GVAL | SFGV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,215 | $598 | $617 |
| 20 | $4,633 | $2,318 | $2,315 |
| 30 | $13,252 | $6,737 | $6,515 |
- 0.68%GVAL
- 0.33%SFGV, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Active Value funds
- Median 0.68%
SFGV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
GVAL 8th cheapest of 15 funds
GVAL vs SFGV Dividends
- GVAL 2.60%, better
- SFGV 2.23%
- GVAL $0.94
- SFGV $0.80
- GVAL $0.26
- SFGV $0.14
- GVAL Sep 18, 2026
- SFGV Sep 28, 2026
- GVAL Sep 21, 2026
- SFGV Sep 30, 2026
- GVAL Quarterly
- SFGV Quarterly
Distribution history
GVAL vs SFGV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GVAL 12.8%SFGV 10.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GVAL 1.67SFGV 1.02
- Worst fall
- GVAL −30.8%SFGV −14.5%
- Market sensitivity
- GVAL 0.80SFGV 0.59
Popular comparisons
- 0.68% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.