GXC ranks 4th and NBCE 20th of 28 funds in the China Category.
GXC vs NBCE
GXC −4.42pt a year
0.59%5.01%
GXC 34.0×the volume
23.4K688
NBCE +3.3pt
+8.4%+11.7%
GXC vs NBCE Performance
−19.1%−1.2%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- NBCE 5.01%
- GXC $421M
- NBCE $15M
- GXC −19.1%
- NBCE −1.2%, better
- GXC 2.46%, better
- NBCE 1.36%
- GXC 1539
- NBCE 73
- GXC 23.4K sh, better
- NBCE 688 sh
- GXC $80.17
- NBCE $33.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GXC | NBCE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A85Higher | A77 |
| Risk | B67 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B69Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | A76 | A78Higher |
| Durability | A84Higher | D38 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. GXC and NBCE are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GXCA
NBCEC
In short
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
NBCE A stock-picker's China fund: roughly 70 names spanning mainland A-shares, Hong Kong listings and ADRs, filtered through Neuberger Berman's own ESG ratings and measured against the MSCI China All Shares Index.
Stated mandate
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
NBCE The Fund seeks long-term capital growth and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equity investments economically tied to China, primarily China A-shares, Chinese securities listed in Hong Kong, and ADRs.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GXC vs NBCE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GXC vs NBCE Cost
Overpaying NBCE vs GXC
$46,427
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
NBCE 5.01%
$58,062
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GXC | NBCE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $7,494 | $6,436 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $23,866 | $19,815 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $58,062 | $46,427 |
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- 5.01%NBCE
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
NBCE 28th cheapest of 28 funds
GXC vs NBCE Dividends
- GXC 2.46%, better
- NBCE 1.36%
- GXC $1.99
- NBCE $0.44
- GXC $0.67
- NBCE $0.44
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- NBCE Dec 19, 2025
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- NBCE Dec 24, 2025
- GXC Twice a year
- NBCE Irregular
Distribution history
GXC vs NBCE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GXC 20.7%, betterNBCE 24.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- GXC 0.27NBCE 0.39, better
- Worst fall
- GXC −46.5%NBCE −28.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GXC 0.69NBCE 0.92
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 5.01% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 5.01% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 5.01% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.