CXSE ranks 1st and NBCE 20th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CXSE vs NBCE
CXSE −4.69pt a year
0.32%5.01%
CXSE 54.1×the volume
37.2K688
NBCE +7.1pt
+4.6%+11.7%
CXSE vs NBCE Performance
−24.9%−1.2%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- NBCE 5.01%
- CXSE $372M
- NBCE $15M
- CXSE −24.9%
- NBCE −1.2%, better
- CXSE 2.22%, better
- NBCE 1.36%
- CXSE 241
- NBCE 73
- CXSE 37.2K sh, better
- NBCE 688 sh
- CXSE $31.37
- NBCE $33.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CXSE | NBCE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A77 |
| Risk | C47 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | A74 | A78Higher |
| Durability | A79Higher | D38 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CXSE and NBCE are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CXSEA
NBCEC
In short
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
NBCE A stock-picker's China fund: roughly 70 names spanning mainland A-shares, Hong Kong listings and ADRs, filtered through Neuberger Berman's own ESG ratings and measured against the MSCI China All Shares Index.
Stated mandate
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
NBCE The Fund seeks long-term capital growth and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equity investments economically tied to China, primarily China A-shares, Chinese securities listed in Hong Kong, and ADRs.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CXSE vs NBCE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CXSE vs NBCE Cost
Overpaying NBCE vs CXSE
$51,520
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
NBCE 5.01%
$58,062
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CXSE | NBCE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $7,494 | $6,914 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $23,866 | $21,616 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $58,062 | $51,520 |
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- 5.01%NBCE
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
NBCE 28th cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE vs NBCE Dividends
- CXSE 2.22%, better
- NBCE 1.36%
- CXSE $0.69
- NBCE $0.44
- CXSE $0.26
- NBCE $0.44
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- NBCE Dec 19, 2025
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- NBCE Dec 24, 2025
- CXSE Quarterly
- NBCE Irregular
Distribution history
CXSE vs NBCE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CXSE 24.9%NBCE 24.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CXSE 0.12NBCE 0.39, better
- Worst fall
- CXSE −57.6%NBCE −28.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CXSE 0.75NBCE 0.92
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 5.01% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 5.01% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 5.01% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.