SIZE ranks 3rd and HAPS 22nd of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
HAPS vs SIZE
SIZE −0.46pt a year
0.61%0.15%
SIZE 33.2×the volume
1575.21K
HAPS +0.4pt
+19.3%+18.9%
HAPS vs SIZE Performance
+22.9%+13.8%
- HAPS 0.61%
- SIZE 0.15%, better
- HAPS $173M
- SIZE $433M
- HAPS +22.9%, better
- SIZE +13.8%
- HAPS 0.47%
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- HAPS 188
- SIZE 518
- HAPS 157 sh
- SIZE 5.21K sh, better
- HAPS $37.76
- SIZE $180.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HAPS | SIZE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A81Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A93Higher |
| Risk | C40 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | F8 | F23Higher |
| Holdings | A81 | A88Higher |
| Durability | D30 | B57Higher |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. HAPS and SIZE are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HAPSD
SIZEA
In short
HAPS A small-cap index fund that screens on corporate culture. Irrational Capital scores companies on how they treat their workforce, and Harbor holds the roughly 200 US small caps that rank highest. A people signal, not a balance-sheet one.
SIZE The size factor without leaving the large-cap pool: SIZE holds roughly 500 US stocks and leans toward the smaller names in that universe, spreading weight away from the mega-cap giants. An iShares factor original from 2013.
Stated mandate
HAPS The fund seeks pre-fee and pre-expense returns that correspond to the Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index. It uses an indexing approach and invests at least 80% of assets in index securities.
SIZE The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. stocks that have smaller market capitalizations relative to their peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HAPS vs SIZE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HAPS vs SIZE Cost
Overpaying HAPS vs SIZE
$8,861
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HAPS 0.61%
$11,998
SIZE 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HAPS | SIZE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,093 | $274 | $819 |
| 20 | $4,181 | $1,071 | $3,110 |
| 30 | $11,998 | $3,137 | $8,861 |
- 0.61%HAPS
- 0.15%SIZE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
SIZE 5th cheapest of 30 funds
HAPS 28th cheapest of 30 funds
HAPS vs SIZE Dividends
- HAPS 0.47%
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- HAPS $0.18
- SIZE $2.47
- HAPS $0.18
- SIZE $0.65
- HAPS Dec 19, 2025
- SIZE Sep 15, 2026
- HAPS Dec 24, 2025
- SIZE Sep 18, 2026
- HAPS Annual
- SIZE Quarterly
Distribution history
HAPS vs SIZE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HAPS 18.7%SIZE 13.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HAPS 0.80SIZE 1.06, better
- Worst fall
- HAPS −27.4%SIZE −24.0%
- Market sensitivity
- HAPS 1.16SIZE 0.97
Popular comparisons
- 0.61% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.