HBDC ranks 1st and LALT 9th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
HBDC vs LALT
HBDC −0.79pt a year
0.39%1.18%
LALT 15.0×the volume
8.86K133K
HBDC vs LALT Performance
+2.9%+10.8%
- HBDC 0.39%, better
- LALT 1.18%
- HBDC $91M
- LALT $446M
- HBDC +2.9%
- LALT +10.8%, better
- HBDC 5.11%, better
- LALT 4.03%
- HBDC 156
- LALT 8
- HBDC 8.86K sh
- LALT 133K sh, better
- HBDC $24.50
- LALT $24.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HBDC | LALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C48 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | A86Higher | D27 |
| Durability | C49 | A75Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. HBDC and LALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HBDCA
LALTB
In short
HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.
LALT Most funds in this corner run one playbook: trend. LALT is the sampler plate, an actively managed mix of alternative strategies from First Trust, built to move differently from stocks and bonds. The variety costs extra.
Stated mandate
HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.
LALT The Fund seeks long-term total return through active allocation among alternative asset categories and strategies intended to provide diversification and lower correlation with traditional equity and fixed-income benchmarks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HBDC vs LALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HBDC vs LALT Cost
Overpaying LALT vs HBDC
$13,645
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HBDC 0.39%
$7,898
LALT 1.18%
$21,543
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HBDC | LALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $2,065 | $1,360 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $7,697 | $4,972 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $21,543 | $13,645 |
- 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
- 1.18%LALT
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
HBDC cheapest of 29 funds
LALT 16th cheapest of 29 funds
HBDC vs LALT Dividends
- HBDC 5.11%, better
- LALT 4.03%
- HBDC $1.25
- LALT $0.98
- HBDC $0.11
- LALT $0.08
- HBDC Oct 29, 2026
- LALT Sep 24, 2026
- HBDC Oct 30, 2026
- LALT Sep 30, 2026
- HBDC Monthly
- LALT Quarterly
Distribution history
HBDC vs LALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HBDC 2.5%LALT 4.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- HBDC −0.27LALT 1.23
- Worst fall
- HBDC −3.0%LALT −7.0%
- Market sensitivity
- HBDC 0.13LALT 0.15
HBDC and LALT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


