HBDC ranks 2nd and RNMN 6th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
HBDC vs RNMN
HBDC −0.20pt a year
0.39%0.59%
HBDC 7.6×the volume
7.84K1.03K
HBDC vs RNMN Performance
+2.0%+1.1%
- HBDC 0.39%, better
- RNMN 0.59%
- HBDC $90M
- RNMN $7M
- HBDC +2.0%, better
- RNMN +1.1%
- HBDC 5.15%
- RNMN 11.84%, better
- HBDC 156
- RNMN 219
- HBDC 7.84K sh, better
- RNMN 1.03K sh
- HBDC $24.37
- RNMN $25.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HBDC | RNMN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A97 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C48Higher | F10 |
| Holdings | A86 | A90Higher |
| Durability | C49Higher | C43 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. HBDC and RNMN are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HBDCA
RNMNB
In short
HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.
RNMN A 2022 pre-merger SPAC arbitrage fund that grew up: RiverNorth widened it in 2026 into a full market-neutral book of arbitrage and relative-value trades, aiming at returns untethered from stocks and bonds.
Stated mandate
HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.
RNMN The Fund seeks consistent total return with limited correlation to equity markets. It uses a market-neutral strategy intended to generate returns in both rising and falling markets through investment characteristics and relative pricing differences.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HBDC vs RNMN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HBDC vs RNMN Cost
Overpaying RNMN vs HBDC
$3,737
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HBDC 0.39%
$7,898
RNMN 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HBDC | RNMN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,058 | $353 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,051 | $1,326 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $11,635 | $3,737 |
- 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
- 0.59%RNMN
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
HBDC cheapest of 29 funds
RNMN 2nd cheapest of 29 funds
HBDC vs RNMN Dividends
- HBDC 5.15%
- RNMN 11.84%, better
- HBDC $1.25
- RNMN $3.08
- HBDC $0.11
- RNMN $3.08
- HBDC Oct 29, 2026
- RNMN Dec 24, 2025
- HBDC Oct 30, 2026
- RNMN Dec 26, 2025
- HBDC Monthly
- RNMN Annual
Distribution history
HBDC vs RNMN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HBDC 2.5%RNMN 3.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- HBDC −0.28RNMN 0.34
- Worst fall
- HBDC −3.0%RNMN −4.4%
- Market sensitivity
- HBDC 0.13RNMN 0.02
HBDC and RNMN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
