Skip to content

HEFT vs RISN

Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF

HEFTBNYSE Arca

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

1.1%by weight

Expense ratio

HEFT −0.02pt a year

HEFT0.70%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

HEFT 1.2×the volume

HEFT17.9KRISN14.8K

HEFT vs RISN Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+2.2%HEFT+7.1%RISN

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. HEFT +2.2%. RISN +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%5%10%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
HEFT 0.70%, better
RISN 0.72%
Fund size
HEFT $75M
RISN $68M
1Y total return
HEFT No data
RISN +6.6%
Yield (12M)
HEFT No data
RISN 1.05%
Holdings
HEFT 33
RISN 52
Avg volume (30D)
HEFT 17.9K sh, better
RISN 14.8K sh
NAV per share
HEFT $25.86
RISN $30.17
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HEFT: Cost 78, Risk 38, Mission 65, Tradability 55, Holdings 51, Durability 54. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 49, Mission 84, Tradability 65, Holdings 79, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for HEFT, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHEFTRISN
Cost30% weightA78HigherA76
Mission25% weightB65A84Higher
Risk15% weightD38C49Higher
Tradability15% weightB55B65Higher
Holdings10% weightC51A79Higher
Durability5% weightC54B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HEFT and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 2nd and HEFT 11th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3APBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 9BMATRHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 61
  6. Rank 12BHIDEAlpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HEFTBHedgeye Fourth Turning ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

HEFT A research shop's macro call in ETF form. HEFT runs an active long/short book guided by Fourth Turning generational theory: long what it reads as demographic tailwinds, short what it expects to fade.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

HEFT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an actively managed long/short strategy informed by Fourth Turning generational theory, varying exposure across U.S. equities, fixed income, commodities, currencies, and up to 20% international securities.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • HEFT 0.70% a year, below the median for tactical multi-asset funds, and that buys an active long/short mandate rather than a rules file on autopilot.
  • The short sleeve is the point. Managers can position against areas they expect to weaken instead of only choosing which longs to own.
  • One legible thesis drives both sides of the book, so the fund's calls can be judged against the framework it publishes rather than a black box.
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • HEFT Launched in 2025. There is not yet a long record showing how the generational-cycle framework behaves across different market regimes.
  • Shorting cuts both ways: borrow costs are ongoing, and a short position's losses are not bounded the way a long position's are.
  • Small and lightly traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than in the category's household names. The mandate targets capital appreciation, not income.
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full HEFT profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

HEFT vs RISN Holdings

How HEFT and RISN differ

Overlap by weight

1.1%

Shared holdings make up 1.7% of RISN and 1.1% of HEFT.

About this figure: HEFT holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both1.1%
  • Sector12 Sectors44.7%
  • Countryby domicile93.5%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in HEFT and RISN, widest gap first
SectorMore in HEFTMore in RISNGap
IndustrialsRISN +28.4 points
Consumer StaplesHEFT +17.2 points
GovernmentHEFT +15.7 points
Health CareHEFT +14.1 points
FinancialsRISN +8.1 points
EnergyRISN +7.4 points
TechnologyHEFT +7.1 points
MaterialsRISN +6.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryRISN +4.2 points
UtilitiesHEFT +0.9 points
Real EstateRISN +0.3 points
CommunicationHEFT +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in HEFT and RISN, widest gap first
CountryMore in HEFTMore in RISNGap
United StatesRISN +6.5 points
CanadaHEFT +2.4 points
Other countries (20)HEFT +4.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • HEFT78.7%
  • RISN37.1%

Securities held

  • HEFT32
  • RISN52

Asset class

HEFT
Stocks
RISN
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in HEFT31
  • In both1
  • Only in RISN51

Only in HEFT

31 securities, 100% of HEFT by weight

  • Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF14.77%
  • State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF10.70%
  • iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF10.31%

Only in RISN

51 securities, 98.4% of RISN by weight

  • Wisdomtree Float19.70%
  • Applovin Co-Cl A2.28%
  • Home Depot Inc1.96%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in HEFT and RISN, widest gap first
HoldingMore in HEFTMore in RISNGap
Linde PLCLINRISN +0.62 points

All HEFT holdings⁠All RISN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HEFT vs RISN Cost

Overpaying RISN vs HEFT

$351

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HEFT 0.70%

    $13,606

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HEFT 0.70%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530RISN $13,957HEFT $13,606

Year by year

YearHEFTRISNOverpaying
10$1,250$1,284$34
20$4,760$4,888$128
30$13,606$13,957$351

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%HEFT, cheaper
  • 0.72%RISN
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

HEFT 11th cheapest of 46 funds

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

HEFT vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
HEFT No data
RISN 1.05%
Payout (12M)
HEFT No data
RISN $0.32
Last payment
HEFT $0.005
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
HEFT Dec 30, 2025
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
HEFT Dec 31, 2025
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
HEFT Irregular
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

HEFTIrregular · 1 paymentAll HEFT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.005. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

HEFT vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HEFT No dataRISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HEFT No dataRISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HEFT No dataRISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HEFT 0.16RISN 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • HEFTBvsENDWA

    Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HEFTBvsPBLA

    Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPBLA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HEFTBvsPTBDA

    Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.