ILCV ranks 2nd and HERD 87th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
HERD vs ILCV
ILCV −0.70pt a year
0.74%0.04%
ILCV 5.7×the volume
4.27K24.4K
ILCV +1.5pt
+11.1%+12.6%
HERD vs ILCV Performance
+69.6%+81.1%
- HERD 0.74%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- HERD $105M
- ILCV $1.37B
- HERD +23.7%, better
- ILCV +21.0%
- HERD 3.37%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- HERD 6
- ILCV 375
- HERD 4.27K sh
- ILCV 24.4K sh, better
- HERD $51.16
- ILCV $109.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HERD | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A82Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | F23 | D39Higher |
| Durability | D28 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. HERD and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HERDD
ILCVA
In short
HERD One ticket for Pacer's entire free-cash-flow lineup: five Cash Cows ETFs at 20% each, spanning US large caps, small caps, growth, global dividend payers and developed international. The price for that bundling is 0.74%.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
HERD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. It is composed of Pacer Cash Cows ETFs, whose underlying indexes use rules-based cash-flow strategies.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HERD vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HERD vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying HERD vs ILCV
$13,458
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HERD 0.74%
$14,307
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HERD | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $73 | $1,246 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $288 | $4,727 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $849 | $13,458 |
- 0.74%HERD
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
HERD 96th cheapest of 99 funds
HERD vs ILCV Dividends
- HERD 3.37%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- HERD $1.72
- ILCV $1.65
- HERD $0.55
- ILCV $0.42
- HERD Sep 4, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- HERD Sep 9, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- HERD Twice a year
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
HERD vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HERD
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HERD 12.9%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HERD 1.03ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- HERD −21.6%ILCV −18.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- HERD 0.71ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.