VYM ranks 2nd and HERD 87th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
HERD vs VYM
VYM −0.70pt a year
0.74%0.04%
VYM 267.3×the volume
4.27K1.14M
VYM +0.7pt
+11.1%+11.8%
HERD vs VYM Performance
+69.6%+74.3%
- HERD 0.74%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- HERD $105M
- VYM $95.8B
- HERD +23.7%, better
- VYM +19.3%
- HERD 3.37%, better
- VYM 2.24%
- HERD 6
- VYM 601
- HERD 4.27K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- HERD $51.16
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HERD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A79Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | F23 | C53Higher |
| Durability | D28 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. HERD and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HERDD
VYMA
In short
HERD One ticket for Pacer's entire free-cash-flow lineup: five Cash Cows ETFs at 20% each, spanning US large caps, small caps, growth, global dividend payers and developed international. The price for that bundling is 0.74%.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
HERD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. It is composed of Pacer Cash Cows ETFs, whose underlying indexes use rules-based cash-flow strategies.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HERD vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HERD vs VYM Cost
Overpaying HERD vs VYM
$13,458
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HERD 0.74%
$14,307
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HERD | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $73 | $1,246 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $288 | $4,727 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $849 | $13,458 |
- 0.74%HERD
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
HERD 96th cheapest of 99 funds
HERD vs VYM Dividends
- HERD 3.37%, better
- VYM 2.24%
- HERD $1.72
- VYM $3.68
- HERD $0.55
- VYM $0.89
- HERD Sep 4, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- HERD Sep 9, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- HERD Twice a year
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
HERD vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HERD
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HERD 12.9%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HERD 1.03VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- HERD −21.6%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- HERD 0.71VYM 0.75
HERD and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



