IMCV ranks 4th and HERD 87th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
HERD vs IMCV
IMCV −0.68pt a year
0.74%0.06%
IMCV 9.1×the volume
4.27K38.9K
HERD +0.1pt
+11.1%+11.0%
HERD vs IMCV Performance
+69.6%+68.3%
- HERD 0.74%
- IMCV 0.06%, better
- HERD $105M
- IMCV $1.27B
- HERD +23.7%
- IMCV +27.0%, better
- HERD 3.37%, better
- IMCV 1.84%
- HERD 6
- IMCV 271
- HERD 4.27K sh
- IMCV 38.9K sh, better
- HERD $51.16
- IMCV $99.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HERD | IMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A76 |
| Risk | B65 | A77Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | F23 | B69Higher |
| Durability | D28 | A77Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. HERD and IMCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HERDD
IMCVA
In short
HERD One ticket for Pacer's entire free-cash-flow lineup: five Cash Cows ETFs at 20% each, spanning US large caps, small caps, growth, global dividend payers and developed international. The price for that bundling is 0.74%.
Stated mandate
HERD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. It is composed of Pacer Cash Cows ETFs, whose underlying indexes use rules-based cash-flow strategies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HERD vs IMCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HERD vs IMCV Cost
Overpaying HERD vs IMCV
$13,037
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HERD 0.74%
$14,307
IMCV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HERD | IMCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $110 | $1,209 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $432 | $4,583 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $1,270 | $13,037 |
- 0.74%HERD
- 0.06%IMCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
IMCV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
HERD 96th cheapest of 99 funds
HERD vs IMCV Dividends
- HERD 3.37%, better
- IMCV 1.84%
- HERD $1.72
- IMCV $1.83
- HERD $0.55
- IMCV $0.52
- HERD Sep 4, 2026
- IMCV Sep 15, 2026
- HERD Sep 9, 2026
- IMCV Sep 18, 2026
- HERD Twice a year
- IMCV Quarterly
Distribution history
HERD vs IMCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HERD
- IMCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HERD 12.9%, betterIMCV 13.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- HERD 1.03IMCV 1.22, better
- Worst fall
- HERD −21.6%IMCV −19.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- HERD 0.71IMCV 0.88
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.