Skip to content

HF vs PTBD

DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF

HFDNYSE

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTBD −1.10pt a year

HF1.70%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 46.7×the volume

HF398PTBD18.6K

3Y return · a year

HF +4.9pt

HF+9.8%PTBD+4.9%

HF vs PTBD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.7%HF−0.1%PTBD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. HF +7.7%. PTBD −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%2%4%6%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HF 1.70%
PTBD 0.60%, better
Fund size
HF $21M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
HF +7.7%, better
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
HF 0.88%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Holdings
HF 18
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
HF 398 sh
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
NAV per share
HF $22.68
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HF: Cost 9, Risk 75, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 51, Durability 51. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for HF, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHFPTBD
Cost30% weightF9A83Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA75HigherB60
Tradability15% weightC42C50Higher
Holdings10% weightC51A90Higher
Durability5% weightC51A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HF and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and HF 40th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 38DNMBLNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETFScore 38
  6. Rank 40DHFDGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETFScore 37
  7. Rank 41DXNAVFundX Aggressive ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HFDDGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

HF Ticker HF, mandate to match: hedge-fund-style absolute return in a plain ETF wrapper, chasing appreciation with capital preservation second. The hedge-fund fee came along too: 1.70% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

HF The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation, with capital preservation as a secondary objective.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • HF The prospectus commits to both goals: long-term capital appreciation first, capital preservation second. Most tactical funds name one and leave the rest to interpretation.
  • Ordinary 1940 Act ETF plumbing: daily liquidity, a 1099 instead of a K-1, no lockups or gates. The hedge-fund idea without the hedge-fund paperwork.sec.gov
  • Risk is the strongest part of its profile. On volatility and drawdown it has run calmer than most tactical multi-asset peers.
  • Concentrated by design, a few dozen positions, so the manager's calls actually move the portfolio instead of averaging into plain beta.
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • HF Cost is the headwind: 1.70% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026 (1.85% gross), above the category median. Peers ENDW at 0.22% and PTBD at 0.60% sit far below.
  • No declared index and no published tracking evidence, so there is no rulebook to check the strategy against. You are buying the manager's model.
  • Small and thinly traded: spreads can widen and sizeable orders can nudge the price. Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly.
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full HF profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

HF vs PTBD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HF vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying HF vs PTBD

$17,224

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HF 1.70%

    $29,041

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HF 1.70%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530HF $29,041PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearHFPTBDOverpaying
10$2,911$1,076$1,835
20$10,606$4,116$6,490
30$29,041$11,817$17,224

Expense ratio

  • 1.70%HF
  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

HF 42nd cheapest of 46 funds

HF vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HF 0.88%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Payout (12M)
HF $0.20
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
HF $0.20
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
HF Dec 29, 2025
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
HF Dec 30, 2025
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
HF Annual
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

HFAnnual · 3 paymentsAll HF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2023 $0.51; Dec 23, 2024 $2.28; Dec 29, 2025 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

HF vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HF 6.0%PTBD 5.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HF 0.85, betterPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HF −6.0%since Aug 2023PTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HF 0.42PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • HFDvsENDWA

    DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HFDvsGMODA

    DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HFDvsRISNA

    DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.