PTBD ranks 3rd and HF 40th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
HF vs PTBD
PTBD −1.10pt a year
1.70%0.60%
PTBD 46.7×the volume
39818.6K
HF +4.9pt
+9.8%+4.9%
HF vs PTBD Performance
+7.7%−0.1%
- HF 1.70%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- HF $21M
- PTBD $83M
- HF +7.7%, better
- PTBD −0.1%
- HF 0.88%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- HF 18
- PTBD 1047
- HF 398 sh
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- HF $22.68
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HF | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F9 | A83Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A75Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | C42 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A90Higher |
| Durability | C51 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. HF and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HFD
PTBDA
In short
HF Ticker HF, mandate to match: hedge-fund-style absolute return in a plain ETF wrapper, chasing appreciation with capital preservation second. The hedge-fund fee came along too: 1.70% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
HF The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation, with capital preservation as a secondary objective.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HF vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HF vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying HF vs PTBD
$17,224
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HF 1.70%
$29,041
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HF | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,911 | $1,076 | $1,835 |
| 20 | $10,606 | $4,116 | $6,490 |
| 30 | $29,041 | $11,817 | $17,224 |
- 1.70%HF
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
HF 42nd cheapest of 46 funds
HF vs PTBD Dividends
- HF 0.88%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- HF $0.20
- PTBD $1.17
- HF $0.20
- PTBD $0.10
- HF Dec 29, 2025
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- HF Dec 30, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- HF Annual
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
HF vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HF 6.0%PTBD 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HF 0.85, betterPTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- HF −6.0%PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- HF 0.42PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 1.70% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.