SDOW ranks 2nd and HIBS 12th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
HIBS vs SDOW
SDOW −0.11pt a year
1.06%0.95%
SDOW 17.9×the volume
215K3.85M
SDOW +28.6pt
−51.7%−23.1%
HIBS vs SDOW Performance
−97.4%−73.1%
- HIBS 1.06%
- SDOW 0.95%, better
- HIBS $18M
- SDOW $154M
- HIBS −59.4%
- SDOW −21.9%, better
- HIBS 6.05%, better
- SDOW 4.76%
- HIBS 5
- SDOW 10
- HIBS 215K sh
- SDOW 3.85M sh, better
- HIBS $18.71
- SDOW $25.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HIBS | SDOW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | F24 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | F23 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | F23 | B67Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. HIBS and SDOW are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HIBSF
SDOWA
In short
HIBS Most 3x bear funds short an index. HIBS shorts a factor: the S&P 500's 100 most market-sensitive stocks, aiming for -300% of that basket's move for one day, then the math resets.
SDOW The only -3x ETF pointed at the Dow. SDOW aims to deliver three times the inverse of the index's daily move, reset at each close, for 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
HIBS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to -300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500® High Beta Index, before fees and expenses. Its objective applies for a single day and is not intended to provide the same multiple over longer periods.
SDOW SDOW seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times the inverse of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HIBS vs SDOW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HIBS vs SDOW Cost
Overpaying HIBS vs SDOW
$1,786
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HIBS 1.06%
$19,655
SDOW 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HIBS | SDOW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,864 | $1,678 | $186 |
| 20 | $6,987 | $6,322 | $665 |
| 30 | $19,655 | $17,869 | $1,786 |
- 1.06%HIBS
- 0.95%SDOW, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SDOW 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
HIBS 11th cheapest of 14 funds
HIBS vs SDOW Dividends
- HIBS 6.05%, better
- SDOW 4.76%
- HIBS $1.30
- SDOW $1.19
- HIBS $0.22
- SDOW $0.29
- HIBS Sep 22, 2026
- SDOW Sep 23, 2026
- HIBS Sep 29, 2026
- SDOW Sep 29, 2026
- HIBS Quarterly
- SDOW Quarterly
Distribution history
HIBS vs SDOW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HIBS
- SDOW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HIBS 62.6%SDOW 34.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HIBS −1.40SDOW −1.22, better
- Worst fall
- HIBS −98.8%SDOW −85.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- HIBS −3.96SDOW −2.46
Popular comparisons
- 1.06% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.