SQQQ ranks 1st and HIBS 12th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
HIBS vs SQQQ
SQQQ −0.12pt a year
1.06%0.94%
SQQQ 232.2×the volume
215K50M
SQQQ +9.2pt
−51.7%−42.5%
HIBS vs SQQQ Performance
−97.4%−93.7%
- HIBS 1.06%
- SQQQ 0.94%, better
- HIBS $18M
- SQQQ $2.04B
- HIBS −59.4%
- SQQQ −32.5%, better
- HIBS 6.05%
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- HIBS 5
- SQQQ 12
- HIBS 215K sh
- SQQQ 50M sh, better
- HIBS $18.71
- SQQQ $41.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HIBS | SQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | F24 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | F23 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | |
| Durability | F23 | A73Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. HIBS and SQQQ are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HIBSF
SQQQA
In short
HIBS Most 3x bear funds short an index. HIBS shorts a factor: the S&P 500's 100 most market-sensitive stocks, aiming for -300% of that basket's move for one day, then the math resets.
SQQQ The workhorse of the short-Nasdaq trade. Running since 2010, it aims at three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100's daily move, resets every session, and charges 0.94% a year, below the going rate in the 3x bear category.
Stated mandate
HIBS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to -300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500® High Beta Index, before fees and expenses. Its objective applies for a single day and is not intended to provide the same multiple over longer periods.
SQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100 Index’s daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HIBS vs SQQQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HIBS vs SQQQ Cost
Overpaying HIBS vs SQQQ
$1,951
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HIBS 1.06%
$19,655
SQQQ 0.94%
$17,704
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HIBS | SQQQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,864 | $1,661 | $203 |
| 20 | $6,987 | $6,260 | $727 |
| 30 | $19,655 | $17,704 | $1,951 |
- 1.06%HIBS
- 0.94%SQQQ, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SQQQ cheapest of 14 funds
HIBS 11th cheapest of 14 funds
HIBS vs SQQQ Dividends
- HIBS 6.05%
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- HIBS $1.30
- SQQQ $3.25
- HIBS $0.22
- SQQQ $0.47
- HIBS Sep 22, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- HIBS Sep 29, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- HIBS Quarterly
- SQQQ Quarterly
Distribution history
HIBS vs SQQQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HIBS
- SQQQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HIBS 62.6%SQQQ 48.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HIBS −1.40, betterSQQQ −1.42
- Worst fall
- HIBS −98.8%SQQQ −97.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- HIBS −3.96SQQQ −3.43
Popular comparisons
- 1.06% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.