SRTY ranks 3rd and HIBS 12th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
HIBS vs SRTY
SRTY −0.11pt a year
1.06%0.95%
SRTY 7.4×the volume
215K1.6M
SRTY +22.7pt
−51.7%−29.0%
HIBS vs SRTY Performance
−97.4%−82.0%
- HIBS 1.06%
- SRTY 0.95%, better
- HIBS $18M
- SRTY $68M
- HIBS −59.4%
- SRTY −37.4%, better
- HIBS 6.05%, better
- SRTY 5.87%
- HIBS 5
- SRTY 5
- HIBS 215K sh
- SRTY 1.6M sh, better
- HIBS $18.71
- SRTY $26.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HIBS | SRTY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | F24 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | F23 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F23 | B56Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. HIBS and SRTY are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HIBSF
SRTYA
In short
HIBS Most 3x bear funds short an index. HIBS shorts a factor: the S&P 500's 100 most market-sensitive stocks, aiming for -300% of that basket's move for one day, then the math resets.
SRTY A one-day instrument by design: SRTY aims for three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and it has been the ProShares small-cap bear since 2010.
Stated mandate
HIBS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to -300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500® High Beta Index, before fees and expenses. Its objective applies for a single day and is not intended to provide the same multiple over longer periods.
SRTY SRTY seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HIBS vs SRTY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HIBS vs SRTY Cost
Overpaying HIBS vs SRTY
$1,786
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HIBS 1.06%
$19,655
SRTY 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HIBS | SRTY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,864 | $1,678 | $186 |
| 20 | $6,987 | $6,322 | $665 |
| 30 | $19,655 | $17,869 | $1,786 |
- 1.06%HIBS
- 0.95%SRTY, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SRTY 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
HIBS 11th cheapest of 14 funds
HIBS vs SRTY Dividends
- HIBS 6.05%, better
- SRTY 5.87%
- HIBS $1.30
- SRTY $1.55
- HIBS $0.22
- SRTY $0.27
- HIBS Sep 22, 2026
- SRTY Sep 23, 2026
- HIBS Sep 29, 2026
- SRTY Sep 29, 2026
- HIBS Quarterly
- SRTY Quarterly
Distribution history
HIBS vs SRTY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HIBS
- SRTY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HIBS 62.6%SRTY 54.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HIBS −1.40SRTY −1.04, better
- Worst fall
- HIBS −98.8%SRTY −92.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- HIBS −3.96SRTY −3.24
Popular comparisons
- 1.06% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.