SCHZ ranks 2nd and HTAB 87th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
HTAB vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.36pt a year
0.39%0.03%
SCHZ 21.6×the volume
110K2.37M
HTAB +0.6pt
+0.4%−0.2%
HTAB vs SCHZ Performance
+2.0%−1.0%
- HTAB 0.39%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- HTAB $224M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- HTAB −0.7%
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- HTAB 3.93%
- SCHZ 4.27%, better
- HTAB 171
- SCHZ 12610
- HTAB 110K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- HTAB $18.45
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HTAB | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | A97Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D30 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. HTAB and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HTABC
SCHZA
In short
HTAB Most funds in the aggregate-bond aisle chase yield before taxes. HTAB chases what survives them: its stated goal is after-tax total return from investment-grade bonds, and it is measured against a municipal bond benchmark rather than a taxable aggregate one.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
HTAB The Fund seeks after-tax total return through a diversified portfolio of fixed-income debt instruments with varying maturities. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in U.S.-dollar-denominated, investment-grade fixed-income debt.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HTAB vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HTAB vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying HTAB vs SCHZ
$7,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HTAB 0.39%
$7,898
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HTAB | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $55 | $650 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $216 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $638 | $7,260 |
- 0.39%HTAB
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
HTAB 67th cheapest of 114 funds
HTAB vs SCHZ Dividends
- HTAB 3.93%
- SCHZ 4.27%, better
- HTAB $0.73
- SCHZ $0.96
- HTAB $0.06
- SCHZ $0.08
- HTAB Oct 29, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- HTAB Pays Nov 2, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- HTAB Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
HTAB vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HTAB
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HTAB 7.5%SCHZ 5.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HTAB 0.11SCHZ 0.17, better
- Worst fall
- HTAB −14.1%, betterSCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- HTAB 1.07SCHZ 0.99
HTAB and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
