HYLB ranks 3rd and HYBL 54th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYBL vs HYLB
HYLB −0.65pt a year
0.70%0.05%
HYLB 8.8×the volume
139K1.22M
HYLB +0.4pt
+8.1%+8.5%
HYBL vs HYLB Performance
+3.0%+1.9%
- HYBL 0.70%
- HYLB 0.05%, better
- HYBL $587M
- HYLB $3.3B
- HYBL +3.0%, better
- HYLB +1.9%
- HYBL 7.12%, better
- HYLB 6.73%
- HYBL 657
- HYLB 1280
- HYBL 139K sh
- HYLB 1.22M sh, better
- HYBL $27.48
- HYLB $35.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYBL | HYLB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A74 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B64Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | A77 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | A88Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A77Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYBL and HYLB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYBLC
HYLBA
In short
HYBL A Blackstone-branded, actively managed take on high income: rather than tracking a junk bond index, the managers roam bonds and loans chasing income with less volatility than those markets.
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
HYBL Actively managed strategy seeking risk-adjusted total return and high current income, with lower volatility than general bond and loan segments over full market cycles.
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYBL vs HYLB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYBL vs HYLB Cost
Overpaying HYBL vs HYLB
$12,546
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYBL 0.70%
$13,606
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYBL | HYLB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $92 | $1,158 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $360 | $4,400 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $1,060 | $12,546 |
- 0.70%HYBL
- 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
HYBL 77th cheapest of 84 funds
HYBL vs HYLB Dividends
- HYBL 7.12%, better
- HYLB 6.73%
- HYBL $1.95
- HYLB $2.37
- HYBL $0.16
- HYLB $0.20
- HYBL Oct 1, 2026
- HYLB Oct 1, 2026
- HYBL Oct 6, 2026
- HYLB Oct 8, 2026
- HYBL Monthly
- HYLB Monthly
Distribution history
HYBL vs HYLB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYBL 3.3%, betterHYLB 4.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYBL 1.08, betterHYLB 0.82
- Worst fall
- HYBL −8.5%HYLB −15.5%
- Market sensitivity
- HYBL 0.34HYLB 0.66
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.