SCYB ranks 1st and HYBL 54th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYBL vs SCYB
SCYB −0.67pt a year
0.70%0.03%
SCYB 7.9×the volume
139K1.1M
SCYB +0.3pt
+8.1%+8.4%
HYBL vs SCYB Performance
+3.0%+2.0%
- HYBL 0.70%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYBL $587M
- SCYB $2.8B
- HYBL +3.0%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- HYBL 7.12%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYBL 657
- SCYB 1844
- HYBL 139K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- HYBL $27.48
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYBL | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A74 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B64Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | A77 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | A99Higher |
| Durability | B66 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYBL and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYBLC
SCYBA
In short
HYBL A Blackstone-branded, actively managed take on high income: rather than tracking a junk bond index, the managers roam bonds and loans chasing income with less volatility than those markets.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYBL Actively managed strategy seeking risk-adjusted total return and high current income, with lower volatility than general bond and loan segments over full market cycles.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYBL vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYBL vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYBL vs SCYB
$12,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYBL 0.70%
$13,606
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYBL | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $55 | $1,195 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $216 | $4,544 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $638 | $12,968 |
- 0.70%HYBL
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYBL 77th cheapest of 84 funds
HYBL vs SCYB Dividends
- HYBL 7.12%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYBL $1.95
- SCYB $1.80
- HYBL $0.16
- SCYB $0.16
- HYBL Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- HYBL Oct 6, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- HYBL Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYBL vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYBL 3.3%, betterSCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYBL 1.08, betterSCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- HYBL −8.5%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYBL 0.34SCYB 0.28
HYBL and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
