HYGW ranks 3rd and OMAH 11th of 24 funds in the Other Index Option Income Category.
HYGW vs OMAH
HYGW −0.29pt a year
0.69%0.98%
OMAH 43.8×the volume
24.8K1.09M
HYGW vs OMAH Performance
+3.3%+11.6%
- HYGW 0.69%, better
- OMAH 0.98%
- HYGW $110M
- OMAH $1.12B
- HYGW +3.3%
- OMAH +11.6%, better
- HYGW 11.09%
- OMAH 15.34%, better
- HYGW 1328
- OMAH 48
- HYGW 24.8K sh
- OMAH 1.09M sh, better
- HYGW $28.13
- OMAH $18.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYGW | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63Higher | F9 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A70Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | B62 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C52 |
| Durability | A76 | A76 |
Rank among Other Index Option Income funds
Same Category. HYGW and OMAH are both graded against the same 24 Other Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYGWB
OMAHC
In short
HYGW Covered calls, but on junk bonds instead of stocks. It holds iShares' high yield corporate bond ETF and writes monthly calls against it, stacking option premium on top of coupon income, paid out monthly.
OMAH Berkshire famously pays no dividend. OMAH builds a book around its 20 largest stock holdings plus BRK.B itself, then sells calls on them to chase a 15% annual income target, paid monthly, for 0.98% a year.
Stated mandate
HYGW The fund seeks exposure to the iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.
OMAH The fund primarily seeks income and secondarily seeks long-term capital appreciation. It combines an equity portfolio based on the Solactive Berkshire Portfolio Top 20 Index NTR with an options portfolio intended to pursue a 15% annual income target.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYGW vs OMAH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYGW vs OMAH Cost
Overpaying OMAH vs HYGW
$4,933
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYGW 0.69%
$13,429
OMAH 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYGW | OMAH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,729 | $497 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $6,504 | $1,807 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $18,362 | $4,933 |
- 0.69%HYGW, cheaper
- 0.98%OMAH
- Middle half of Other Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.74%
HYGW 9th cheapest of 24 funds
OMAH 22nd cheapest of 24 funds
HYGW vs OMAH Dividends
- HYGW 11.09%
- OMAH 15.34%, better
- HYGW $3.12
- OMAH $2.78
- HYGW $0.37
- OMAH $0.23
- HYGW Oct 2, 2026
- OMAH Oct 26, 2026
- HYGW Oct 7, 2026
- OMAH Oct 27, 2026
- HYGW Monthly
- OMAH Monthly
Distribution history
HYGW vs OMAH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYGW 2.4%OMAH 7.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYGW 0.61OMAH 0.74
- Worst fall
- HYGW −5.5%OMAH −11.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYGW 0.30OMAH 0.24
HYGW and OMAH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
