SIOO ranks 2nd and OMAH 11th of 24 funds in the Other Index Option Income Category.
OMAH vs SIOO
SIOO −0.39pt a year
0.98%0.59%
OMAH 101.7×the volume
1.09M10.7K
OMAH vs SIOO Performance
+9.6%+8.2%
- OMAH 0.98%
- SIOO 0.59%, better
- OMAH $1.12B
- SIOO $25M
- OMAH +11.6%
- SIOO
- OMAH 15.34%
- SIOO
- OMAH 48
- SIOO 109
- OMAH 1.09M sh, better
- SIOO 10.7K sh
- OMAH $18.03
- SIOO $19.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OMAH | SIOO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F9 | A91Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | A97Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | C52 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | C42 |
Rank among Other Index Option Income funds
Same Category. OMAH and SIOO are both graded against the same 24 Other Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OMAHC
SIOOA
In short
OMAH Berkshire famously pays no dividend. OMAH builds a book around its 20 largest stock holdings plus BRK.B itself, then sells calls on them to chase a 15% annual income target, paid monthly, for 0.98% a year.
SIOO Most equity-income ETFs pay out whatever the options market hands them. SIOO starts from the answer: a 15% annual income target, paid monthly, bolted onto an S&P 100 core using index options that carry 60/40 tax treatment.
Stated mandate
OMAH The fund primarily seeks income and secondarily seeks long-term capital appreciation. It combines an equity portfolio based on the Solactive Berkshire Portfolio Top 20 Index NTR with an options portfolio intended to pursue a 15% annual income target.
SIOO The actively managed ETF seeks income and, secondarily, long-term capital appreciation. It combines equity exposure based on the S&P 100 Index (OEX) with an options portfolio intended to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OMAH vs SIOO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OMAH vs SIOO Cost
Overpaying OMAH vs SIOO
$6,727
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OMAH 0.98%
$18,362
SIOO 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OMAH | SIOO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $1,058 | $671 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $4,051 | $2,453 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $11,635 | $6,727 |
- 0.98%OMAH
- 0.59%SIOO, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.74%
SIOO 3rd cheapest of 24 funds
OMAH 22nd cheapest of 24 funds
OMAH vs SIOO Dividends
- OMAH 15.34%
- SIOO
- OMAH $2.78
- SIOO
- OMAH $0.23
- SIOO $0.25
- OMAH Oct 26, 2026
- SIOO Oct 26, 2026
- OMAH Oct 27, 2026
- SIOO Oct 27, 2026
- OMAH Monthly
- SIOO Monthly
Distribution history
OMAH vs SIOO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OMAH 7.5%SIOO
- Return per unit of risk
- OMAH 0.74SIOO
- Worst fall
- OMAH −11.9%SIOO
- Market sensitivity
- OMAH 0.24SIOO 0.57
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.