HYLB ranks 1st and MUSE 74th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYLB vs MUSE
HYLB −0.51pt a year
0.05%0.56%
HYLB 1492.7×the volume
1.32M885
HYLB vs MUSE Performance
+2.7%+3.3%
- HYLB 0.05%, better
- MUSE 0.56%
- HYLB $3.29B
- MUSE $37M
- HYLB +2.7%
- MUSE +3.3%, better
- HYLB 6.72%
- MUSE 8.04%, better
- HYLB 1286
- MUSE 281
- HYLB 1.32M sh, better
- MUSE 885 sh
- HYLB $35.21
- MUSE $47.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYLB | MUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | F21 |
| Mission | A100Higher | F6 |
| Risk | B58Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | A86Higher | B69 |
| Durability | A76Higher | F21 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYLB and MUSE are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYLBA
MUSED
In short
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
MUSE Most of the high yield aisle just tracks an index. MUSE is a TCW credit team picking its own spots across junk bonds, bank loans and emerging market debt, with income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
MUSE The fund is actively managed and seeks long-term income through a diversified, multisector fixed-income portfolio.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYLB vs MUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYLB vs MUSE Cost
Overpaying MUSE vs HYLB
$10,028
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
MUSE 0.56%
$11,088
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYLB | MUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $1,006 | $914 |
| 20 | $360 | $3,855 | $3,495 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $11,088 | $10,028 |
- 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
- 0.56%MUSE
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
MUSE 70th cheapest of 84 funds
HYLB vs MUSE Dividends
- HYLB 6.72%
- MUSE 8.04%, better
- HYLB $2.37
- MUSE $3.87
- HYLB $0.19
- MUSE $0.32
- HYLB Nov 2, 2026
- MUSE Nov 2, 2026
- HYLB Nov 9, 2026
- MUSE Nov 4, 2026
- HYLB Monthly
- MUSE Monthly
Distribution history
HYLB vs MUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYLB 4.8%MUSE 3.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYLB 0.82MUSE 0.27
- Worst fall
- HYLB −15.5%MUSE −3.6%
- Market sensitivity
- HYLB 0.66MUSE 0.21
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.