SPHY ranks 3rd and MUSE 74th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
MUSE vs SPHY
SPHY −0.51pt a year
0.56%0.05%
SPHY 6910.4×the volume
8856.12M
MUSE vs SPHY Performance
+3.3%+2.7%
- MUSE 0.56%
- SPHY 0.05%, better
- MUSE $37M
- SPHY $11.9B
- MUSE +3.3%, better
- SPHY +2.7%
- MUSE 8.04%, better
- SPHY 7.37%
- MUSE 281
- SPHY 1921
- MUSE 885 sh
- SPHY 6.12M sh, better
- MUSE $47.98
- SPHY $22.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUSE | SPHY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A98Higher |
| Mission | F6 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B55 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | D37 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | B69 | A97Higher |
| Durability | F21 | A93Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. MUSE and SPHY are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUSED
SPHYA
In short
MUSE Most of the high yield aisle just tracks an index. MUSE is a TCW credit team picking its own spots across junk bonds, bank loans and emerging market debt, with income paid monthly.
SPHY State Street's junk-bond workhorse: roughly 1,900 US high yield bonds in one wrapper for 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high yield ETF charges, with income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
MUSE The fund is actively managed and seeks long-term income through a diversified, multisector fixed-income portfolio.
SPHY The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE BofA US High Yield Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUSE vs SPHY Holdings
How MUSE and SPHY differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country66.6%
- Sector80.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in MUSEMore in SPHY | Gap | MUSE | SPHY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate | SPHY +19.7 points | 80.3% | 100.0% | |
| Government | MUSE +18.3 points | 18.3% | 0.0% | |
| Securitized | MUSE +1.3 points | 1.3% | 0.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in MUSEMore in SPHY | Gap | MUSE | SPHY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | SPHY +26.6 points | 59.5% | 86.1% | |
| Saudi Arabia | MUSE +19.1 points | 19.7% | 0.6% | |
| Canada | SPHY +2.6 points | 1.4% | 4.0% | |
| Mexico | MUSE +2.1 points | 2.1% | 0.0% | |
| Brazil | MUSE +1.8 points | 1.8% | 0.0% | |
| Netherlands | MUSE +1.9 points | 2.5% | 0.6% | |
| Colombia | MUSE +1.8 points | 1.8% | 0.0% | |
| Argentina | MUSE +1.4 points | 1.4% | 0.0% | |
| Other countries (20) | MUSE +1.1 points | 9.7% | 8.6% |
Outside the US: MUSE 24% developed, 76% emerging.
Concentration
- MUSE9.6%
- SPHY3.4%
- MUSE279
- SPHY1,893
Asset class
- MUSE
- Bonds
- SPHY
- Bonds
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. MUSE holds 279 securities, SPHY 1,893.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUSE vs SPHY Cost
Overpaying MUSE vs SPHY
$10,028
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUSE 0.56%
$11,088
SPHY 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUSE | SPHY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,006 | $92 | $914 |
| 20 | $3,855 | $360 | $3,495 |
| 30 | $11,088 | $1,060 | $10,028 |
- 0.56%MUSE
- 0.05%SPHY, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SPHY 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
MUSE 70th cheapest of 84 funds
MUSE vs SPHY Dividends
- MUSE 8.04%, better
- SPHY 7.37%
- MUSE $3.87
- SPHY $1.67
- MUSE $0.32
- SPHY $0.14
- MUSE Nov 2, 2026
- SPHY Nov 2, 2026
- MUSE Nov 4, 2026
- SPHY Nov 5, 2026
- MUSE Monthly
- SPHY Monthly
Distribution history
MUSE vs SPHY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUSE 3.3%SPHY 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUSE 0.27SPHY 0.88
- Worst fall
- MUSE −3.6%SPHY −15.3%
- Market sensitivity
- MUSE 0.21SPHY 0.64
MUSE and SPHY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.56% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





