SCYB ranks 1st and MUSE 74th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
MUSE vs SCYB
SCYB −0.53pt a year
0.56%0.03%
SCYB 1288.2×the volume
8851.14M
MUSE vs SCYB Performance
+3.3%+2.6%
- MUSE 0.56%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- MUSE $37M
- SCYB $2.73B
- MUSE +3.3%, better
- SCYB +2.6%
- MUSE 8.04%, better
- SCYB 7.16%
- MUSE 281
- SCYB 1838
- MUSE 885 sh
- SCYB 1.14M sh, better
- MUSE $47.98
- SCYB $25.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUSE | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A100Higher |
| Mission | F6 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B55 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | D37 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | B69 | A99Higher |
| Durability | F21 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. MUSE and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUSED
SCYBA
In short
MUSE Most of the high yield aisle just tracks an index. MUSE is a TCW credit team picking its own spots across junk bonds, bank loans and emerging market debt, with income paid monthly.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
MUSE The fund is actively managed and seeks long-term income through a diversified, multisector fixed-income portfolio.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUSE vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUSE vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying MUSE vs SCYB
$10,450
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUSE 0.56%
$11,088
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUSE | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,006 | $55 | $951 |
| 20 | $3,855 | $216 | $3,639 |
| 30 | $11,088 | $638 | $10,450 |
- 0.56%MUSE
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
MUSE 70th cheapest of 84 funds
MUSE vs SCYB Dividends
- MUSE 8.04%, better
- SCYB 7.16%
- MUSE $3.87
- SCYB $1.81
- MUSE $0.32
- SCYB $0.16
- MUSE Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- MUSE Nov 4, 2026
- SCYB Nov 6, 2026
- MUSE Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
MUSE vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUSE 3.3%SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUSE 0.27SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- MUSE −3.6%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- MUSE 0.21SCYB 0.28
MUSE and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.56% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
