IAUG ranks 3rd and IMAR 16th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
IAUG vs IMAR
0.3%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.85%0.85%
IAUG 2.5×the volume
25.8K10.4K
IAUG vs IMAR Performance
+8.3%+4.5%
- IAUG 0.85%
- IMAR 0.85%
- IAUG $80M
- IMAR $104M
- IAUG +8.3%, better
- IMAR +4.5%
- IAUG 3
- IMAR 3
- IAUG 25.8K sh, better
- IMAR 10.4K sh
- IAUG $30.19
- IMAR $30.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IAUG | IMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | D38 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | A78Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B63 | B66Higher |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. IAUG and IMAR are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IAUGB
IMARC
In short
IAUG Downside padding for foreign stocks instead of the usual S&P 500 target. IAUG shadows the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, absorbs the first 15% of a year's losses, and trades away upside above a cap reset every August 1.
IMAR Buffered ETFs are almost always an S&P 500 story. IMAR runs the same playbook overseas: EAFE developed-market stocks, the first 15% of losses absorbed, upside capped, resetting every March.
Stated mandate
IAUG The Fund seeks to match the return of its underlying ETF up to a predetermined upside cap while protecting against the first 15% of underlying ETF losses during the outcome period.
IMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses over the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IAUG vs IMAR Holdings
How IAUG and IMAR differ
0.3%
Shared holdings make up 0.3% of IMAR and 0.3% of IAUG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.3%
Sector
No Sector split for IMAR.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IAUGMore in IMAR | IAUG | IMAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | Same weight | 24.3% | 24.3% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 14.1% | 14.1% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 10.2% | 10.2% |
| Germany | Same weight | 8.8% | 8.8% |
| France | Same weight | 8.3% | 8.3% |
| Australia | Same weight | 6.7% | 6.7% |
| Netherlands | Same weight | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Spain | Same weight | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Other countries (17) | Same weight | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Outside the US: IAUG 99% developed, 1% emerging. IMAR 99% developed, 1% emerging.
Concentration
- IAUG102.2%
- IMAR100.9%
- IAUG3
- IMAR3
Asset class
- IAUG
- Equity
- IMAR
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in IAUG2
- In both1
- Only in IMAR2
Only in IAUG
2 securities, 100% of IAUG by weight
- Efa 07/30/2027 1.06 C96.25%
- Efa 07/30/2027 105.58 P5.67%
Only in IMAR
2 securities, 100% of IMAR by weight
- Efa 02/26/2027 1.05 C96.45%
- Efa 02/26/2027 105.38 P4.09%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in IAUGMore in IMAR | IAUG | IMAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037 | IMAR +0.05 points | 0.28% | 0.33% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IAUG vs IMAR Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,199
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IAUG 0.85%
$16,199
IMAR 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IAUG | IMAR |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,508 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,706 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $16,199 |
- 0.85%IAUG
- 0.85%IMAR
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
IAUG 11th cheapest of 26 funds
IMAR 11th cheapest of 26 funds
IAUG vs IMAR Dividends
- IAUG None
- IMAR None
Distribution history
IAUG vs IMAR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IAUG 6.3%IMAR 7.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IAUG 0.63IMAR 0.34
- Worst fall
- IAUG −8.0%IMAR −9.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IAUG 0.25IMAR 0.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.