BUFI ranks 1st and IMAR 16th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
BUFI vs IMAR
0.0%by weight
BUFI −0.16pt a year
0.69%0.85%
BUFI 1.1×the volume
11.8K10.4K
BUFI vs IMAR Performance
+6.6%+4.5%
- BUFI 0.69%, better
- IMAR 0.85%
- BUFI $137M
- IMAR $104M
- BUFI +6.6%, better
- IMAR +4.5%
- BUFI 4
- IMAR 3
- BUFI 11.8K sh, better
- IMAR 10.4K sh
- BUFI $41.81
- IMAR $30.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFI | IMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | C54 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C54 | B66Higher |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFI and IMAR are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFIB
IMARC
In short
IMAR Buffered ETFs are almost always an S&P 500 story. IMAR runs the same playbook overseas: EAFE developed-market stocks, the first 15% of losses absorbed, upside capped, resetting every March.
Stated mandate
IMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses over the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFI vs IMAR Holdings
How BUFI and IMAR differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BUFI and 0.0% of IMAR.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for IMAR.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BUFIMore in IMAR | BUFI | IMAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | Same weight | 24.3% | 24.3% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 14.1% | 14.1% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 10.2% | 10.2% |
| Germany | Same weight | 8.8% | 8.8% |
| France | Same weight | 8.3% | 8.3% |
| Australia | Same weight | 6.7% | 6.7% |
| Netherlands | Same weight | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Spain | Same weight | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Other countries (17) | Same weight | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Outside the US: BUFI 99% developed, 1% emerging. IMAR 99% developed, 1% emerging.
Concentration
- BUFI102.2%
- IMAR100.9%
- BUFI3
- IMAR3
Asset class
- BUFI
- Alternatives
- IMAR
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BUFI3
- In both0
- Only in IMAR3
Only in BUFI
3 securities, 100% of BUFI by weight
- 4EFA 01/29/27 C0.52 4EFA 01/29/27 C0.5298.90%
- 4EFA 01/29/27 P102.89 4EFA 01/29/27 P102.892.97%
- Alliancebernstein Govt Stif Ssc Fund 64BA Agis 5870.36%
Only in IMAR
3 securities, 100% of IMAR by weight
- Efa 02/26/2027 1.05 C96.45%
- Efa 02/26/2027 105.38 P4.09%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.33%
Weight gaps
BUFI and IMAR share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFI vs IMAR Cost
Overpaying IMAR vs BUFI
$2,770
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFI 0.69%
$13,429
IMAR 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFI | IMAR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,508 | $276 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,706 | $1,009 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $16,199 | $2,770 |
- 0.69%BUFI, cheaper
- 0.85%IMAR
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
BUFI 5th cheapest of 26 funds
IMAR 11th cheapest of 26 funds
BUFI vs IMAR Dividends
- BUFI None
- IMAR None
Distribution history
BUFI vs IMAR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFI 5.7%IMAR 7.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFI 1.21IMAR 0.34
- Worst fall
- BUFI −7.4%IMAR −9.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFI 0.24IMAR 0.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.