Skip to content

IMAR vs QBIF

Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

IMARCNYSE Arca

AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

QBIFBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QBIF −0.11pt a year

IMAR0.85%QBIF0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

IMAR 3.6×the volume

IMAR10.4KQBIF2.9K

IMAR vs QBIF Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−0.9%IMAR−0.9%QBIF

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. IMAR −0.9%. QBIF −0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
IMAR 0.85%
QBIF 0.74%, better
Fund size
IMAR $104M
QBIF $9M
1Y total return
IMAR +4.5%
QBIF No data
Holdings
IMAR 3
QBIF 3
Avg volume (30D)
IMAR 10.4K sh, better
QBIF 2.9K sh
NAV per share
IMAR $30.40
QBIF $25.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IMAR: Cost 38, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. QBIF: Cost 78, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings 55, Durability 26.
Pillar letters and Scores for IMAR, QBIF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIMARQBIF
Cost30% weightD38A78Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD27A76Higher
Tradability15% weightB58HigherD35
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB55
Durability5% weightB66HigherD26

Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IMAR and QBIF are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 26 ›

QBIF ranks 2nd and IMAR 16th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBUFIAB International Buffer ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQBIFAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BIAUGInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 16CARLIAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 16CIMARInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 16CJANIAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IMARCInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

QBIFBAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

In short

IMAR Buffered ETFs are almost always an S&P 500 story. IMAR runs the same playbook overseas: EAFE developed-market stocks, the first 15% of losses absorbed, upside capped, resetting every March.

QBIF No data

Stated mandate

IMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses over the current outcome period.

QBIF No data

Why people hold it

  • IMAR The floor is written into the prospectus, not implied: the fund aims to absorb the first 15% of its EAFE reference ETF's losses over each one-year outcome period.innovatoretfs.com
  • Defined-outcome exposure to foreign developed stocks is a thin shelf, and Innovator runs a full monthly ladder (IAPR, IMAY, IJUL and siblings) so the reset month is your choice.
  • At 0.85% it sits right at the median for buffered EAFE funds and below the 0.90% charged by siblings like YMAR and YSEP.
  • Execution is a strong point: it changes hands more cleanly than most funds in its group, which matters when you may need to enter or exit mid-period.

QBIF No data

Worth knowing

  • IMAR The cap is the price of the floor. A new one is set each March, and once the reference ETF's gains hit it, that's the ceiling for the period.
  • Buy mid-period and you get whatever cap and buffer remain, not the headline 15%. The stated terms apply to investors who hold from one March reset to the next.innovatoretfs.com
  • Launched in 2024, so there's limited history, and the strategy hasn't been an income payer. Any return shows up as price movement.

QBIF No data

Full IMAR profile⁠

Full QBIF profile⁠

IMAR vs QBIF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IMAR vs QBIF Cost

Overpaying IMAR vs QBIF

$1,892

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

  • QBIF 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IMAR 0.85%
  • QBIF 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530IMAR $16,199QBIF $14,307

Year by year

YearIMARQBIFOverpaying
10$1,508$1,319$189
20$5,706$5,015$691
30$16,199$14,307$1,892

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%IMAR
  • 0.74%QBIF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.85%

QBIF 6th cheapest of 26 funds

IMAR 11th cheapest of 26 funds

IMAR vs QBIF Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
IMAR None
QBIF None

Distribution history

IMARAll IMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBIFAll QBIF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IMAR vs QBIF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IMAR 7.1%since Apr 2024QBIF No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IMAR 0.34since Apr 2024QBIF No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IMAR −9.0%since Mar 2024QBIF No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IMAR 0.32QBIF 0.03

Popular comparisons

  • IMARCvsBUFIB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBIFBvsBUFIB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMARCvsIAUGB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBIFBvsIAUGB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMARCvsIJULB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBIFBvsIJULB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.