QBIF ranks 2nd and IMAR 16th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
IMAR vs QBIF
QBIF −0.11pt a year
0.85%0.74%
IMAR 3.6×the volume
10.4K2.9K
IMAR vs QBIF Performance
−0.9%−0.9%
- IMAR 0.85%
- QBIF 0.74%, better
- IMAR $104M
- QBIF $9M
- IMAR +4.5%
- QBIF
- IMAR 3
- QBIF 3
- IMAR 10.4K sh, better
- QBIF 2.9K sh
- IMAR $30.40
- QBIF $25.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMAR | QBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A78Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D27 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | B58Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | B55 | |
| Durability | B66Higher | D26 |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. IMAR and QBIF are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMARC
QBIFB
In short
IMAR Buffered ETFs are almost always an S&P 500 story. IMAR runs the same playbook overseas: EAFE developed-market stocks, the first 15% of losses absorbed, upside capped, resetting every March.
Stated mandate
IMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses over the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMAR vs QBIF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMAR vs QBIF Cost
Overpaying IMAR vs QBIF
$1,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMAR 0.85%
$16,199
QBIF 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMAR | QBIF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,319 | $189 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,015 | $691 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $14,307 | $1,892 |
- 0.85%IMAR
- 0.74%QBIF, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
QBIF 6th cheapest of 26 funds
IMAR 11th cheapest of 26 funds
IMAR vs QBIF Dividends
- IMAR None
- QBIF None
Distribution history
IMAR vs QBIF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMAR 7.1%QBIF
- Return per unit of risk
- IMAR 0.34QBIF
- Worst fall
- IMAR −9.0%QBIF
- Market sensitivity
- IMAR 0.32QBIF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.