IJUL ranks 4th and IMAR 16th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
IJUL vs IMAR
0.3%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.85%0.85%
IJUL 4.3×the volume
44.8K10.4K
IJUL vs IMAR Performance
+9.9%+4.5%
- IJUL 0.85%
- IMAR 0.85%
- IJUL $256M
- IMAR $104M
- IJUL +9.9%, better
- IMAR +4.5%
- IJUL 0.00%
- IMAR
- IJUL 3
- IMAR 3
- IJUL 44.8K sh, better
- IMAR 10.4K sh
- IJUL $35.98
- IMAR $30.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IJUL | IMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A91Higher | B66 |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. IJUL and IMAR are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IJULB
IMARC
In short
IJUL Most buffer ETFs babysit the S&P 500. IJUL points the same 15% downside cushion at developed markets outside the US, tracking an EAFE index fund up to a cap over a one-year outcome period that restarts each July.
IMAR Buffered ETFs are almost always an S&P 500 story. IMAR runs the same playbook overseas: EAFE developed-market stocks, the first 15% of losses absorbed, upside capped, resetting every March.
Stated mandate
IJUL The fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
IMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses over the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IJUL vs IMAR Holdings
How IJUL and IMAR differ
0.3%
Shared holdings make up 0.3% of IMAR and 0.3% of IJUL.
Level by level
- Holdings0.3%
Sector
No Sector split for IMAR.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IJULMore in IMAR | IJUL | IMAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | Same weight | 24.3% | 24.3% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 14.1% | 14.1% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 10.2% | 10.2% |
| Germany | Same weight | 8.8% | 8.8% |
| France | Same weight | 8.3% | 8.3% |
| Australia | Same weight | 6.7% | 6.7% |
| Netherlands | Same weight | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Spain | Same weight | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Other countries (17) | Same weight | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Outside the US: IJUL 99% developed, 1% emerging. IMAR 99% developed, 1% emerging.
Concentration
- IJUL101.9%
- IMAR100.9%
- IJUL3
- IMAR3
Asset class
- IJUL
- Equity
- IMAR
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in IJUL2
- In both1
- Only in IMAR2
Only in IJUL
2 securities, 100% of IJUL by weight
- Efa 06/30/2027 1.04 C96.70%
- Efa 06/30/2027 103.88 P4.92%
Only in IMAR
2 securities, 100% of IMAR by weight
- Efa 02/26/2027 1.05 C96.45%
- Efa 02/26/2027 105.38 P4.09%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in IJULMore in IMAR | IJUL | IMAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037 | IMAR +0.07 points | 0.26% | 0.33% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IJUL vs IMAR Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,199
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IJUL 0.85%
$16,199
IMAR 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IJUL | IMAR |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,508 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,706 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $16,199 |
- 0.85%IJUL
- 0.85%IMAR
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
IJUL 11th cheapest of 26 funds
IMAR 11th cheapest of 26 funds
IJUL vs IMAR Dividends
- IJUL 0.00%
- IMAR
- IJUL None
- IMAR None
Distribution history
IJUL vs IMAR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IJUL 7.4%IMAR 7.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IJUL 1.07IMAR 0.34
- Worst fall
- IJUL −14.6%IMAR −9.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IJUL 0.46IMAR 0.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.