Skip to content

IJUL vs IMAR

Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

IJULBNYSE Arca

Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

IMARCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.3%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

IJUL0.85%IMAR0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

IJUL 4.3×the volume

IJUL44.8KIMAR10.4K

IJUL vs IMAR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+9.9%IJUL+4.5%IMAR

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. IJUL +9.9%. IMAR +4.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%7.5%12.5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
IJUL 0.85%
IMAR 0.85%
Fund size
IJUL $256M
IMAR $104M
1Y total return
IJUL +9.9%, better
IMAR +4.5%
Yield (12M)
IJUL 0.00%
IMAR No data
Holdings
IJUL 3
IMAR 3
Avg volume (30D)
IJUL 44.8K sh, better
IMAR 10.4K sh
NAV per share
IJUL $35.98
IMAR $30.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IJUL: Cost 38, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings not scored, Durability 91. IMAR: Cost 38, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for IJUL, IMAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIJULIMAR
Cost30% weightD38D38
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC52HigherD27
Tradability15% weightA81HigherB58
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA91HigherB66

Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IJUL and IMAR are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 26 ›

IJUL ranks 4th and IMAR 16th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBUFIAB International Buffer ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQBIFAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BIAUGInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 4BIJULInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4BIOCTInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 16CARLIAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETFScore 42
  7. Rank 16CIMARInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 42
  8. Rank 16CJANIAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IJULBInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

IMARCInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

In short

IJUL Most buffer ETFs babysit the S&P 500. IJUL points the same 15% downside cushion at developed markets outside the US, tracking an EAFE index fund up to a cap over a one-year outcome period that restarts each July.

IMAR Buffered ETFs are almost always an S&P 500 story. IMAR runs the same playbook overseas: EAFE developed-market stocks, the first 15% of losses absorbed, upside capped, resetting every March.

Stated mandate

IJUL The fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

IMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses over the current outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • IJUL The mechanics are fixed by prospectus: absorb the first 15% of the reference ETF's losses over the outcome period, participate in gains up to a cap set when that period begins.innovatoretfs.com
  • Foreign exposure, not another S&P 500 clone. The reference asset is the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, so the buffer sits on developed-market equity.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.85% a year, it charges exactly the median fee of its buffer peer group. No surcharge for pointing the structure overseas.
  • Running since 2019 and one of the strongest implementations in its cohort, with sibling months (IMAR, IAPR, IMAY) available if you want staggered start dates.
  • IMAR The floor is written into the prospectus, not implied: the fund aims to absorb the first 15% of its EAFE reference ETF's losses over each one-year outcome period.innovatoretfs.com
  • Defined-outcome exposure to foreign developed stocks is a thin shelf, and Innovator runs a full monthly ladder (IAPR, IMAY, IJUL and siblings) so the reset month is your choice.
  • At 0.85% it sits right at the median for buffered EAFE funds and below the 0.90% charged by siblings like YMAR and YSEP.
  • Execution is a strong point: it changes hands more cleanly than most funds in its group, which matters when you may need to enter or exit mid-period.

Worth knowing

  • IJUL The cap is the price of the cushion: upside stops there for the period. Buying mid-period means your own buffer and cap differ from the stated terms.
  • Return comes from share price, not income. The options-based structure has produced no distributions, so EAFE's dividend stream is not passed through.
  • Volume is light next to plain index funds, so spreads and limit orders matter more at the moment you trade.
  • IMAR The cap is the price of the floor. A new one is set each March, and once the reference ETF's gains hit it, that's the ceiling for the period.
  • Buy mid-period and you get whatever cap and buffer remain, not the headline 15%. The stated terms apply to investors who hold from one March reset to the next.innovatoretfs.com
  • Launched in 2024, so there's limited history, and the strategy hasn't been an income payer. Any return shows up as price movement.

Full IJUL profile⁠

Full IMAR profile⁠

IJUL vs IMAR Holdings

How IJUL and IMAR differ

Overlap by weight

0.3%

Shared holdings make up 0.3% of IMAR and 0.3% of IJUL.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both0.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for IMAR.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in IJUL and IMAR, widest gap first
CountryMore in IJULMore in IMAR
JapanSame weight
United KingdomSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
GermanySame weight
FranceSame weight
AustraliaSame weight
NetherlandsSame weight
SpainSame weight
Other countries (17)Same weight

Outside the US: IJUL 99% developed, 1% emerging. IMAR 99% developed, 1% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • IJUL101.9%
  • IMAR100.9%

Securities held

  • IJUL3
  • IMAR3

Asset class

IJUL
Equity
IMAR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in IJUL2
  • In both1
  • Only in IMAR2

Only in IJUL

2 securities, 100% of IJUL by weight

  • Efa 06/30/2027 1.04 C96.70%
  • Efa 06/30/2027 103.88 P4.92%

Only in IMAR

2 securities, 100% of IMAR by weight

  • Efa 02/26/2027 1.05 C96.45%
  • Efa 02/26/2027 105.38 P4.09%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in IJUL and IMAR, widest gap first
HoldingMore in IJULMore in IMAR
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037IMAR +0.07 points

All 6 IJUL holdings⁠All 6 IMAR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IJUL vs IMAR Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IJUL 0.85%

    $16,199

  • IMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IJUL 0.85%
  • IMAR 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530IJUL $16,199IMAR $16,199

Year by year

YearIJULIMAR
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%IJUL
  • 0.85%IMAR
  • Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.85%

IJUL 11th cheapest of 26 funds

IMAR 11th cheapest of 26 funds

IJUL vs IMAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
IJUL 0.00%
IMAR No data
Payout (12M)
IJUL None
IMAR None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

IJUL1 paymentAll IJUL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252019
IMARAll IMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IJUL vs IMAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IJUL 7.4%IMAR 7.1%since Apr 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IJUL 1.07IMAR 0.34since Apr 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IJUL −14.6%IMAR −9.0%since Mar 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IJUL 0.46IMAR 0.32

Popular comparisons

  • IJULBvsBUFIB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMARCvsBUFIB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IJULBvsQBIFB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMARCvsQBIFB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IJULBvsIAUGB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMARCvsIAUGB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.