IBMQ ranks 1st and MUNC 24th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMQ vs MUNC
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.10%0.18%
IBMQ 164.5×the volume
138K838
IBMQ vs MUNC Performance
+2.3%+1.0%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- MUNC 0.18%
- IBMQ $692M
- MUNC $8M
- IBMQ +2.3%, better
- MUNC +1.0%
- IBMQ 2.49%
- MUNC 3.28%, better
- IBMQ 2968
- MUNC 172
- IBMQ 138K sh, better
- MUNC 838 sh
- IBMQ $25.43
- MUNC $100.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMQ | MUNC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A100Higher | F20 |
| Risk | B59Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | A93Higher | C52 |
| Durability | A94Higher | D31 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMQ and MUNC are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMQA
MUNCD
In short
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
MUNC A twenty-rung municipal bond ladder in one ticker. MUNC pays monthly tax-exempt income and hands principal back each year as rungs mature through 2045, so nobody has to shop for individual bonds.
Stated mandate
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
MUNC The Fund uses an actively managed laddered bond strategy, investing in tax-exempt debt instruments with different maturity dates through 2045.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMQ vs MUNC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMQ vs MUNC Cost
Overpaying MUNC vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
MUNC 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMQ | MUNC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $328 | $145 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,281 | $564 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,749 | $1,643 |
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- 0.18%MUNC
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
MUNC 10th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMQ vs MUNC Dividends
- IBMQ 2.49%
- MUNC 3.28%, better
- IBMQ $0.63
- MUNC $3.30
- IBMQ $0.06
- MUNC $0.30
- IBMQ Nov 2, 2026
- MUNC Nov 2, 2026
- IBMQ Nov 5, 2026
- MUNC Nov 6, 2026
- IBMQ Monthly
- MUNC Monthly
Distribution history
IBMQ vs MUNC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMQ 3.3%MUNC 6.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMQ −0.14MUNC −0.16
- Worst fall
- IBMQ −10.8%MUNC −6.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMQ 0.54MUNC 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.