IBMP ranks 1st and MUNC 24th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMP vs MUNC
IBMP −0.08pt a year
0.10%0.18%
IBMP 134.2×the volume
112K838
IBMP vs MUNC Performance
+2.3%+1.0%
- IBMP 0.10%, better
- MUNC 0.18%
- IBMP $684M
- MUNC $8M
- IBMP +2.3%, better
- MUNC +1.0%
- IBMP 2.55%
- MUNC 3.28%, better
- IBMP 1857
- MUNC 172
- IBMP 112K sh, better
- MUNC 838 sh
- IBMP $25.32
- MUNC $100.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMP | MUNC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A100Higher | F20 |
| Risk | B59Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | A94Higher | C52 |
| Durability | A94Higher | D31 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMP and MUNC are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMPA
MUNCD
In short
IBMP A single rung of a muni ladder in one ticker: investment-grade bonds that all mature in 2027, tax-exempt income paid monthly along the way, and a defined end date instead of a fund that rolls on forever.
MUNC A twenty-rung municipal bond ladder in one ticker. MUNC pays monthly tax-exempt income and hands principal back each year as rungs mature through 2045, so nobody has to shop for individual bonds.
Stated mandate
IBMP The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2027. It is designed to provide tax-exempt income, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
MUNC The Fund uses an actively managed laddered bond strategy, investing in tax-exempt debt instruments with different maturity dates through 2045.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMP vs MUNC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMP vs MUNC Cost
Overpaying MUNC vs IBMP
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMP 0.10%
$2,106
MUNC 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMP | MUNC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $328 | $145 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,281 | $564 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,749 | $1,643 |
- 0.10%IBMP, cheaper
- 0.18%MUNC
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMP cheapest of 32 funds
MUNC 10th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMP vs MUNC Dividends
- IBMP 2.55%
- MUNC 3.28%, better
- IBMP $0.65
- MUNC $3.30
- IBMP $0.06
- MUNC $0.30
- IBMP Nov 2, 2026
- MUNC Nov 2, 2026
- IBMP Nov 5, 2026
- MUNC Nov 6, 2026
- IBMP Monthly
- MUNC Monthly
Distribution history
IBMP vs MUNC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMP 2.3%MUNC 6.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMP −0.33MUNC −0.16
- Worst fall
- IBMP −9.4%MUNC −6.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMP 0.40MUNC 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.