IBMR ranks 3rd and MUNC 24th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMR vs MUNC
IBMR −0.08pt a year
0.10%0.18%
IBMR 130.3×the volume
109K838
IBMR vs MUNC Performance
+2.0%+1.0%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- MUNC 0.18%
- IBMR $535M
- MUNC $8M
- IBMR +2.0%, better
- MUNC +1.0%
- IBMR 2.53%
- MUNC 3.28%, better
- IBMR 2087
- MUNC 172
- IBMR 109K sh, better
- MUNC 838 sh
- IBMR $25.18
- MUNC $100.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMR | MUNC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A96Higher | F20 |
| Risk | C48Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A82Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | A83Higher | C52 |
| Durability | A85Higher | D31 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMR and MUNC are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMRA
MUNCD
In short
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
MUNC A twenty-rung municipal bond ladder in one ticker. MUNC pays monthly tax-exempt income and hands principal back each year as rungs mature through 2045, so nobody has to shop for individual bonds.
Stated mandate
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
MUNC The Fund uses an actively managed laddered bond strategy, investing in tax-exempt debt instruments with different maturity dates through 2045.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMR vs MUNC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMR vs MUNC Cost
Overpaying MUNC vs IBMR
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
MUNC 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMR | MUNC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $328 | $145 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,281 | $564 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,749 | $1,643 |
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- 0.18%MUNC
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
MUNC 10th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMR vs MUNC Dividends
- IBMR 2.53%
- MUNC 3.28%, better
- IBMR $0.64
- MUNC $3.30
- IBMR $0.05
- MUNC $0.30
- IBMR Nov 2, 2026
- MUNC Nov 2, 2026
- IBMR Nov 5, 2026
- MUNC Nov 6, 2026
- IBMR Monthly
- MUNC Monthly
Distribution history
IBMR vs MUNC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMR 4.4%MUNC 6.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMR 0.02MUNC −0.16
- Worst fall
- IBMR −4.8%MUNC −6.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMR 0.75MUNC 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.