IBUF ranks 3rd and RSMR 5th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
IBUF vs RSMR
0.0%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.85%0.85%
IBUF 8.2×the volume
18K2.2K
IBUF vs RSMR Performance
+9.8%+13.7%
- IBUF 0.85%
- RSMR 0.85%
- IBUF $121M
- RSMR $12M
- IBUF +9.8%
- RSMR +13.7%, better
- IBUF 3
- RSMR 3
- IBUF 18K sh, better
- RSMR 2.2K sh
- IBUF $31.34
- RSMR $24.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBUF | RSMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | D39 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | A75 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | C54 | |
| Durability | A80Higher | B61 |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. IBUF and RSMR are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBUFB
RSMRC
In short
IBUF Most buffer ETFs aim at the S&P 500. IBUF looks overseas, using the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF as its reference and buffering the first 10% of losses over each quarterly outcome period, with upside capped in return.
RSMR Most buffer ETFs wrap their cushion around the cap-weighted S&P 500. This one wraps it around the equal-weight version, where the smallest name counts about as much as the biggest, and resets every March.
Stated mandate
IBUF The Fund uses a quarterly defined-outcome strategy based on the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF. It seeks to provide gains up to a cap while buffering the first 10% of reference-asset losses for investors holding through the full outcome period.
RSMR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a 17.80% cap while buffering the first 10% of losses during the stated outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBUF vs RSMR Holdings
How IBUF and RSMR differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IBUF and 0.0% of RSMR.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Country2.4%
Sector
No Sector split for RSMR.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IBUFMore in RSMR | IBUF | RSMR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | RSMR +97.4 points | 1.4% | 98.8% |
| Japan | IBUF +24.3 points | 24.3% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | IBUF +13.9 points | 14.1% | 0.2% |
| Switzerland | IBUF +9.8 points | 10.2% | 0.4% |
| Germany | IBUF +8.8 points | 8.8% | 0.0% |
| France | IBUF +8.3 points | 8.3% | 0.0% |
| Australia | IBUF +6.7 points | 6.7% | 0.0% |
| Netherlands | IBUF +6.0 points | 6.0% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (17) | IBUF +19.7 points | 20.3% | 0.6% |
Outside the US: IBUF 99% developed, 1% emerging.
Concentration
- IBUF102.0%
- RSMR103.3%
- IBUF3
- RSMR2
Asset class
- IBUF
- Alternatives
- RSMR
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in IBUF3
- In both0
- Only in RSMR2
Only in IBUF
3 securities, 100% of IBUF by weight
- Efa 12/31/2026 0.26 C98.12%
- Efa 12/31/2026 103.89 P3.10%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.79%
Only in RSMR
2 securities, 100% of RSMR by weight
- 2027-03-19 Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF C 1.90101.67%
- 2027-03-19 Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF P 190.480.93%
Weight gaps
IBUF and RSMR share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBUF vs RSMR Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,199
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBUF 0.85%
$16,199
RSMR 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBUF | RSMR |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,508 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,706 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $16,199 |
- 0.85%IBUF
- 0.85%RSMR
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
IBUF 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
RSMR 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
IBUF vs RSMR Dividends
- IBUF None
- RSMR None
Distribution history
IBUF vs RSMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBUF 4.0%RSMR 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBUF 1.40RSMR 1.50
- Worst fall
- IBUF −5.9%RSMR −9.1%
- Market sensitivity
- IBUF 0.14RSMR 0.34
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.