TBJL ranks 2nd and RSMR 5th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
RSMR vs TBJL
TBJL −0.06pt a year
0.85%0.79%
TBJL 5.5×the volume
2.2K12.2K
RSMR vs TBJL Performance
+13.7%−6.0%
- RSMR 0.85%
- TBJL 0.79%, better
- RSMR $12M
- TBJL $9M
- RSMR +13.7%, better
- TBJL −6.0%
- RSMR 3
- TBJL 3
- RSMR 2.2K sh
- TBJL 12.2K sh, better
- RSMR $24.43
- TBJL $19.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RSMR | TBJL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A75Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A83Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | C49 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | C54 | |
| Durability | B61 | B61 |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. RSMR and TBJL are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RSMRC
TBJLB
In short
RSMR Most buffer ETFs wrap their cushion around the cap-weighted S&P 500. This one wraps it around the equal-weight version, where the smallest name counts about as much as the biggest, and resets every March.
TBJL Buffer ETFs almost always wrap the S&P 500. This one wraps long-dated Treasuries, absorbing the first 9% of a 12-month price decline in exchange for a cap that resets every July. Duration risk with guardrails.
Stated mandate
RSMR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a 17.80% cap while buffering the first 10% of losses during the stated outcome period.
TBJL The fund seeks to track the price return of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), subject to a 52.27% upside cap and protection against the first 9% of losses during the stated annual outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RSMR vs TBJL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RSMR vs TBJL Cost
Overpaying RSMR vs TBJL
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RSMR 0.85%
$16,199
TBJL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RSMR | TBJL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,405 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,331 | $375 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $15,174 | $1,025 |
- 0.85%RSMR
- 0.79%TBJL, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
TBJL cheapest of 9 funds
RSMR 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
RSMR vs TBJL Dividends
- RSMR None
- TBJL None
Distribution history
RSMR vs TBJL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RSMR 5.6%TBJL 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- RSMR 1.50TBJL −0.19
- Worst fall
- RSMR −9.1%TBJL −28.6%
- Market sensitivity
- RSMR 0.34TBJL 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.